aliens (rojie’s version)

40 responses to “aliens (rojie’s version)”

1. 

   mosckerr

   April 10, 2026

   A Jew-boy alien re-write

   Compare that UN SC 242 propaganda to the current slander of Alex Jones: From “Lone Warrior” to “Nuclear Madness”. The Democrap talking point that perverted President Trump’s steadfast refusal for the Mullah regime in Iran, even before President Reagan replaced Jimmy Carter. The latter’s attempt to employ helicopters to insert special forces troops to free US embassy hostages the Mullah fanatics seized, during a desert wind storm – made with the coming Presidential elections in mind rather than the safety of US personnel. This self-centered shift of priorities exploded Carter’s re-election bid. In the same manner, Alex Jones too, post the Court-Case which closed him in particular and his InfoWars studio down due to his inflammatory touching the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting which horrified the nation roughly 6 months in Obama’s 2nd term as President.

   Alex Jones repeatedly claimed that the 2012 shooting – staged and that the parents merely Hollywood like actors. In like manner he now condemns President Trump’s war rhetoric “total eradication”, to general genocide of the Iranian people rather than the total war removal of the fanatic Mullahs and their drive to attain nuclear weapons by which to attack the Great and Small Satan’s.

   UN Resolution 242 does not concern global conflicts but rather its language “inserts” the post UN repeated condemnations of Israel touching occupied Palestinian lands! 242 does not concern global conflicts but rather its language “inserts” the post UN repeated condemnations of Israel touching occupied Palestinian lands! This UN slander ie European imperialism took advantage of LBJ involvement in the Vietnam War to re-insert Britain and France as great power brokers who themselves determine the balance of power in the Middle East. The 1922 League “Palestine Mandate” based upon 19th Century French maps which the “Sick Man of Europe” acquired which labelled Ottoman Greater-Syria as “Palestine”, coupled with the post WWI British/French division of Sykes-Picot which which devied or apportioned the spoils of the corpse of the Ottoman empire divided up between the two remaining standing Allied empires in Europe including Russia.

   UN 242 propaganda changed the original Palestine League mandate to include an Arab Palestinian state which all Arab states themselves universally rejected in Britain language of UN General Assembly 181. 19th Century European colonial aspirations and maps, redefined territorial boundaries in ways that served great power domination of the balance of power in any given region. British division of Iraq separated from a warm water port in Kuwait and the division of India into two warring nations serve as examples to understand European “interests” to insert their dictates into the Middle East. Absolutely no different from the latest slander “internationalist Democrats in Congress” employ the war rhetoric “total eradication”, as to all Iranians rather than limited to the Mullah communist dictators who themselves seek nuclear destruction of the Great and small Satan’s.

   Post the ’56 Suez crisis IKE terminated the great power status of both London and Paris. Prior to the 2nd Shoah – according to the declared statements of Nasser himself; who promised to rectify the Arab Nakba disgrace! Nakba, not the post ’67 humiliating Arab defeat which switched the narrative to the poor Palestinians peoples scattered into the winds. But rather the ’48 Arab disgrace the invading Arab states failure to throw the Jews into the Sea – Nakba!

   Therefore UN 242, with LBJ’s butt exposed in Vietnam, London & Paris attempted to re-insert their domination in determining the balance of power in the Middle East which IKE utterly negated. UN 242 fits in harmony with Truman’s “containment policy”, and the British empire’s policy of maintaining the balance of power/England as top dog\ resemble one another’s national interests.

   France surrendered to the Nazis after 6 months of actual army on army fighting. So their ‘great power’ status has never recovered from their Nakba defeat. Post ’56 London had to brown-nose Washington. However, the Trump Era Washington, while it has “yet” to pull out of NATO, the stink of the NATO corpse in the air. The Trump political rhetoric that describes NATO as a “Paper Tiger” plays well with giving Putin a face saving out of the Nakba Ukraine war. International politics, while it resembles poker – far more nuanced and complex.

   UN 242: language ambiguity did not “invent” a Palestinian state. But it most certainly serves as the concealed foundation by which all post 242 UN condemnations of Israeli settlements which culminated in Obama’s 2334 which prioritized London and Paris’s efforts to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East strategic interests! Openly clashes with Trump 1.0 Abraham Accords, recognition of Jerusalem and the Golan as part of Israel’s international permanent Capital and borders and Trump 2.0 Gaza Peace Board which excludes Russia, Britain, the UN, and Frog quartet as great power players in the Middle East. The stench of the dead NATO alliance – EU hostility to US economic dominance within EU economies.

   The UN employs the rhetoric of “peace” no different than how Chamberlain did after he personally betrayed the Czech Republic in 1938. Political rhetoric whores “peace” which its lies employ as merely a sweet perfume “noun” that has no teeth. Shalom by stark and obvious contrast a verb that stands upon the foundation of “Trust”. No trust No Shalom. Just that simple.

   For example: The entire history of European and Arab empires have played the back and forth – something like tennis – the “Jewish problem”. Post Shoah ’48 Israel’s have sworn a formal Torah oath: “NEVER AGAIN”. Meaning, Israelis reject foreign power dictates which determine “Final Solutions” for their bogus racist “Jewish Problems”.

   Loading…

   Reply
   1. 

      ianmdudley

      April 10, 2026

      Dude, how many times I gotta say it? DON’T touch America’s boats!

      Loading…

      Reply
      1. 

         justrojie

         April 10, 2026

         🤣

         Loading…

         Reply
      2. 

         mosckerr

         April 11, 2026

         “Dude, how many times I gotta say it? DON’T touch America’s boats!” This line reads like a metaphorical warning. It sets a tone of frustration and defensiveness. In context, it seems to function as 1. A framing device: a casual, almost comedic line that introduces a much heavier political rant. 2. A symbol: “America’s boats” likely stands in for American strategic interests, military assets, or national pride. 3. A warning: “Don’t touch” implies that foreign actors (or political opponents) are crossing boundaries or provoking the U.S.

         Loading…

         Reply
         1. 

            mosckerr

            April 11, 2026

            Must the Mullahs nuke NY before Americans wake up?

            Loading…

            Reply
         2. 

            ianmdudley

            April 11, 2026

            You were warned. Say goodbye to your navy.

            Loading…

            Reply
            1. 

               justrojie

               April 12, 2026

               aw snaps

               Loading…
            2. 

               ianmdudley

               April 12, 2026

               I’d agree if such ‘snaps’ would make this bot stop.

               Loading…
            3. 

               justrojie

               April 12, 2026

               LOL

               Loading…
            4. 

               mosckerr

               April 12, 2026

               LOL which navy are you implying faces immediate threat? Pie in the sky bull shit.

               Loading…
            5. 

               ianmdudley

               April 13, 2026

               We hold these truths to be self-evident:

               You, sir (bot), are an *sshole.

               END OF LINE

               Loading…
            6. 

               mosckerr

               April 13, 2026

               I agree, and that makes you stink, the shit that comes out of my butt.

               Loading…
            7. 

               mosckerr

               April 13, 2026

               An Israeli perspective of Arab dhimmi racism and its impact on the post Shoah guilty European bias which hates the continued existence of Jews

               Israel “recaptured” Samaria from Jordan in the 1967 Six-Day War. After 1948 “Palestine” ceased to exist. Jordan, named its illegal – according to the UN condemnation – “occupation” of its “West Bank”; only Pakistan and Britain recognized the Jordanian nationalization of its “West Bank”. Never once from 1948 – 67 did Jordan validate a “Palestine” of its illegally occupied “West Bank”. The UN did not pass a single resolution titled “Condemnation of Jordan,” it refused to recognize the annexation. Even Yasser Arafat’s PLO Charter did not view Jordan’s illegal occupation of its ’48 “West Bank” as “occupied Palestine”. In international law, non‑recognition of an annexation is the mechanism for declaring it invalid. No different from the UN rejection of Indonesia’s ‘East Timor’, Turkey’s ‘Northern Cyprus’, Russia’s ‘Crimea’. The PLO Charter of 1964 likewise did not view Egyptian rule over Gaza as “occupied Palestinian territory”. The collective UN position was unmistakably that Jordan had no sovereignty over the West Bank; but starting with the purposely vague language of 242 “territories occupied in the recent [1967] conflict”, perfectly clarified by 2334 the UN declares sovereignty to Palestine; despite the cold hard fact that Israel – not a protectorate mandate territory and that Arab Israeli wars determine its borders! Therefore, the post‑1967 terminology is a political invention, not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal reality.

               But post ’67, BBC propaganda screamed “occupied Palestinian territories” – inclusive of both Samaria and Gaza! Britain had no mandate, and therefore no legal claim to make this condemnation of Israel. The same equally applies to the UN through its 242 “all States” propaganda; which serve as the foundation for UN condemnations of Israeli “illegal” settlements of “Palestinian lands”; UN 2334 and the UN open recognition of the “Palestinian State” – proof of propaganda. Never in all human recorded history has their ever existed a “land of Palestine” – not under Ottoman or Arab empires.

               The characterization of land as “occupied Palestinian territories” by both the UN and BBC and French propaganda evokes strong reactions, particularly among those who view this language as delegitimizing Israel’s claims, primarily based upon the 1923 British establishment of Trans-Jordan bordering “Israel” at the Jordan river. The application and interpretation of resolutions, such as UN Resolution 242, initiated to “international claims”/”competing narratives” by foreign outside States regarding “land rights and statehood” with a pro Arab bias which fundamentally rejects dhimmi Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East post the 1917 Balfour Declaration which served as the basis for the League division of Lebanon and Syria awarded to France and Palestine, Trans-Jordan awarded to Britain – based upon the secret accords known today as Sykes-Picot.

               No Israeli-Palestinian “conflict” exists in reality because post the declaration of Jewish national Independence in 1948 the UN “protectorate” over “Palestine” ceased to exist. No different than this mandate ceased to exist as a “British mandate territory” officially ended after it turned that “mandate territory” back to the UN in 1948. From that moment on the British Crown had no more say in the determination of Israeli Independence than it does to determine the Capital of Austin Texas. This equally applies to the post WWII established UN.

               Post-1948, no separate national entity represented as “Palestine” in international law or governance, particularly under Jordanian control of its illegally occupied West Bank and Egyptian control of Gaza – until 1967. The phrase “recaptured” to describe Israel’s actions during the 1967 Six-Day War reflects a perspective that emphasizes a historical and religious connection to the land. This contrasts with views that describe the action as an occupation of land that was already controlled by Jordan — which the UN itself condemned as illegal in 1950.

               UN Resolution 242 and consecutive resolutions employed as Foreign State imperialism propaganda rhetoric which seeks peace. War the result of all British two state solutions! India/Pakistan, Iraq\Kuwait, and two Koreas and two Vietnams glaring examples of ‘great power’ foreign national interests imposed upon “conquered” lands. Great Power international “diplomacy” – the British labelled as “maintaining the balance of power” – which suited British [לאו דווקא] strategic interests.

               The UN’s later recognition of a Palestinian state a further attempt to rewrite historical claims and narratives that do not acknowledge the complexities of sovereignty and self-determination in the context of this region. The framing of successful Israel national Independence by media outlets – such as the BBC and other organizations – have promoted wars not peace. Shalom requires “trust”, peace simply a propaganda “label” of rhetoric. The success of Allied propaganda during WWI which unilaterally declared the Germans as “the Hun barbarians at the gates” produced profound effects on public perception. Critics argue – propaganda rhetoric language that injects “occupation”, aligns with Arab narratives which switched the term Nakba from Arab disastrous military defeat unto Arab stateless Palestinian refugees. No Arab country has yet to end or terminate the refugee status which UNWRA promotes and serves this particular political foreign ‘Great Power States’ imperialist agendas.

               Propaganda that Israel repeatedly violates “international law”, simply another gross example of UN Great Power manipulations expressed through BBC and MSM propaganda arms of foreign states attempts to ‘control the narrative’ through words. Israel as an independent nation – its international borders determined through wars and the diplomacy its establishes with regional state powers. Neither the Parliament of London or any other distant foreign power determines where Israel establishes its Capital much less its international borders with other nation states which share common borders.

               From 1948-67 no recognized sovereign “Palestine” in international law. Jordan and Egypt did not treat their respective areas as “Palestine,” and the UN did not recognize their sovereignty there. Therefore, the later phrase “occupied Palestinian territories” — not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal language, but a post‑1967 political construction.

               UN SC 242 (1967) inserts the phrase “withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict,” not “all the territories” and not “Palestinian territories”; UN SC 2334 (2016) morphs into “occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem,” and labels Israeli settlements there as having “no legal validity.” This effectively retrofits a Palestinian sovereignty claim onto areas that, pre‑1967, had no recognized Palestinian state and no recognized Jordanian/Egyptian sovereignty either. 2334 and the UN’s recognition of “Palestine” as a non‑member observer state (2012) represent a political re‑narration, not a neutral continuation of Mandate‑era law.

               Post‑1967 BBC usage of “occupied Palestinian territories” mirrors the UN’s later terminology, not the earlier legal reality. Britain, having ended its Mandate in 1948, has no legal standing to define Israel’s borders or capital, yet its media and diplomacy still act as if they are arbiters of legitimacy; a continuation of Great Power narrative control—the same mentality that carved up the region under Sykes–Picot and Mandate arrangements. Language like “occupation,” “illegal settlements,” “Palestinian territories” is not neutral description; it’s weaponized vocabulary that encodes a particular political and historical judgment.

               The Abraham Accords invalidates European Middle East politics. In strict legal terms, the Middle East and North African conflict, while ackowleging both terrorist violence with its consequential suffering consequence domino-effect/impact, in strict legal terms, the conflict is between Israel and neighboring Arab states / Arab national movements, not between Israel and a pre‑existing sovereign “Palestine” that the UN or Britain\French propaganda continuously retroactively resurrect – like Jesus on the 3rd day.

               UNRWA and refugee status employed as a deliberate political tool, not a humanitarian necessity—sustaining statelessness to maintain a grievance narrative whose evil intent exploded on Oct 7th 2023 when UNWRA officials participated together with Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in the massacre of 1200 or more Israelis; coupled with the Red Cross refusal to visit for some two years the captured Israeli hostages held under barbaric conditions.

               Loading…
            8. 

               justrojie

               April 14, 2026

               “Never in history was there a land of Palestine”

               Misleading. While there wasn’t a modern sovereign state, the term “Palestine” has been used for centuries (Roman, Byzantine, Ottoman, British periods) as a geographic designation.

               Loading…
            9. 

               mosckerr

               April 14, 2026

               Correct.

               An Israeli perspective of Arab dhimmi racism and its impact on the post Shoah guilty European bias which hates the continued existence of Jews; as expressed through classic church/new Israel replacement theology; Romans 10:12–13 – “For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, since the same Lord of all is rich to all who call on him. For everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” Tawhid & Nicene “Monotheism”, both theology creed belief systems violate both the first and second Sinai commandments. A fundamental distinction separates the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov from either Yishmael or Esav.

               Today Israelis stand and remember “Yom Ha-Shoah”. We Israelis renew the post Shoah oath “Never Again”. We remember the ping-ball custom, practiced by both European and Arab societies, to arbitrarily “solve” their racist “Jewish Problem” throughout the Ages – “Never Again”. The Nazi ‘inferior race’, Arab racism denies Jewish equal rights to achieve כוח ריבוני-Political Independents as an Independent Jewish State in the Middle East. Pre-war White Papers coupled with post war British forced encampments of Jewish refugee survivors, returned to Germany or Cyprus – further amplifies the Israeli post Shoah oath of “NEVER AGAIN” which Yom HaShoah remembers. Both European and Arab/Muslim ‘good name’ reputations shattered with the ’48 forced expulsions of Jews from Arab countries, combined with all Arab states refusal to repatriate their refugee on par with how Israel repatriates Jewish refugee populations. Not a single Arab country has agreed to accept Gazan refugee populations who want to leave destroy Gaza and become “citizens” in other countries. Diplomacy among nations classically entails cutting a political alliance. Such a political alliance stands upon mutually shared trust and interests. The UN spectacularly fails in building on ‘trust’; UN Resolution 1701 serves as a strong proof long before UNWRA joined Hamas on Oct 7th 2023.

               The capacity for Jewish self-defense and political independence – defines modern Zionism. Israel “recaptured” Samaria from Jordan in the 1967 Six-Day War. After 1948 “Palestine” ceased to exist. Jordan, named its illegal – according to the UN condemnation – “occupation” of its “West Bank”; only Pakistan and Britain recognized the Jordanian nationalization of its “West Bank”. Never once from 1948 – 67 did Jordan validate a “Palestine” of its illegally occupied “West Bank”. The UN did not pass a single resolution titled “Condemnation of Jordan,” it refused to recognize the annexation. Even Yasser Arafat’s PLO Charter did not view Jordan’s illegal occupation of its ’48 “West Bank” as “occupied Palestine”. In international law, non‑recognition of an annexation is the mechanism for declaring it invalid. No different from the UN rejection of Indonesia’s ‘East Timor’, Turkey’s ‘Northern Cyprus’, Russia’s ‘Crimea’. The PLO Charter of 1964 likewise did not view Egyptian rule over Gaza as “occupied Palestinian territory”. The collective UN position was unmistakably that Jordan had no sovereignty over the West Bank; but starting with the purposely vague language of 242 “territories occupied in the recent [1967] conflict”, perfectly clarified by 2334 the UN declares sovereignty to Palestine; despite the cold hard fact that Israel – not a protectorate mandate territory and that Arab Israeli wars determine its borders! Therefore, the post‑1967 terminology is a political invention, not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal reality.

               But post ’67, BBC propaganda screamed “occupied Palestinian territories” – inclusive of both Samaria and Gaza! Britain had no mandate, and therefore no legal claim to make this condemnation of Israel. The same equally applies to the UN through its 242 “all States” propaganda; which serve as the foundation for UN condemnations of Israeli “illegal” settlements of “Palestinian lands”; UN 2334 and the UN open recognition of the “Palestinian State” – proof of propaganda. Never in all human recorded history has their ever existed a “land of Palestine” – not under Ottoman or Arab empires.

               The characterization of land as “occupied Palestinian territories” by both the UN and BBC and French propaganda evokes strong reactions, particularly among those who view this language as delegitimizing Israel’s claims, primarily based upon the 1923 British establishment of Trans-Jordan bordering “Israel” at the Jordan river. The application and interpretation of resolutions, such as UN Resolution 242, initiated to “international claims”/”competing narratives” by foreign outside States regarding “land rights and statehood” with a pro Arab bias which fundamentally rejects dhimmi Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East post the 1917 Balfour Declaration which served as the basis for the League division of Lebanon and Syria awarded to France and Palestine, Trans-Jordan awarded to Britain – based upon the secret accords known today as Sykes-Picot.

               No Israeli-Palestinian “conflict” exists in reality because post the declaration of Jewish national Independence in 1948 the UN “protectorate” over “Palestine” ceased to exist. No different than this mandate ceased to exist as a “British mandate territory” officially ended after it turned that “mandate territory” back to the UN in 1948. From that moment on the British Crown had no more say in the determination of Israeli Independence than it does to determine the Capital of Austin Texas. This equally applies to the post WWII established UN.

               Post-1948, no separate national entity represented as “Palestine” in international law or governance, particularly under Jordanian control of its illegally occupied West Bank and Egyptian control of Gaza – until 1967. The phrase “recaptured” to describe Israel’s actions during the 1967 Six-Day War reflects a perspective that emphasizes a historical and religious connection to the land. This contrasts with views that describe the action as an occupation of land that was already controlled by Jordan — which the UN itself condemned as illegal in 1950.

               UN Resolution 242 and consecutive resolutions employed as Foreign State imperialism propaganda rhetoric which seeks peace. War the result of all British two state solutions! India/Pakistan, Iraq\Kuwait, and two Koreas and two Vietnams glaring examples of ‘great power’ foreign national interests imposed upon “conquered” lands. Great Power international “diplomacy” – the British labelled as “maintaining the balance of power” – which suited British [לאו דווקא] strategic interests.

               The UN’s later recognition of a Palestinian state a further attempt to rewrite historical claims and narratives that do not acknowledge the complexities of sovereignty and self-determination in the context of this region. The framing of successful Israel national Independence by media outlets – such as the BBC and other organizations – have promoted wars not peace. Shalom requires “trust”, peace simply a propaganda “label” of rhetoric. The success of Allied propaganda during WWI which unilaterally declared the Germans as “the Hun barbarians at the gates” produced profound effects on public perception. Critics argue – propaganda rhetoric language that injects “occupation”, aligns with Arab narratives which switched the term Nakba from Arab disastrous military defeat unto Arab stateless Palestinian refugees. No Arab country has yet to end or terminate the refugee status which UNWRA promotes and serves this particular political foreign ‘Great Power States’ imperialist agendas.

               Propaganda that Israel repeatedly violates “international law”, simply another gross example of UN Great Power manipulations expressed through BBC and MSM propaganda arms of foreign states attempts to ‘control the narrative’ through words. Israel as an independent nation – its international borders determined through wars and the diplomacy its establishes with regional state powers. Neither the Parliament of London or any other distant foreign power determines where Israel establishes its Capital much less its international borders with other nation states which share common borders.

               From 1948-67 no recognized sovereign “Palestine” in international law. Jordan and Egypt did not treat their respective areas as “Palestine,” and the UN did not recognize their sovereignty there. Therefore, the later phrase “occupied Palestinian territories” — not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal language, but a post‑1967 political construction.

               UN SC 242 (1967) inserts the phrase “withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict,” not “all the territories” and not “Palestinian territories”; UN SC 2334 (2016) morphs into “occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem,” and labels Israeli settlements there as having “no legal validity.” This effectively retrofits a Palestinian sovereignty claim onto areas that, pre‑1967, had no recognized Palestinian state and no recognized Jordanian/Egyptian sovereignty either. 2334 and the UN’s recognition of “Palestine” as a non‑member observer state (2012) represent a political re‑narration, not a neutral continuation of Mandate‑era law.

               Post‑1967 BBC usage of “occupied Palestinian territories” mirrors the UN’s later terminology, not the earlier legal reality. Britain, having ended its Mandate in 1948, has no legal standing to define Israel’s borders or capital, yet its media and diplomacy still act as if they are arbiters of legitimacy; a continuation of Great Power narrative control—the same mentality that carved up the region under Sykes–Picot and Mandate arrangements. Language like “occupation,” “illegal settlements,” “Palestinian territories” is not neutral description; it’s weaponized vocabulary that encodes a particular political and historical judgment.

               The Abraham Accords invalidates European Middle East politics. In strict legal terms, the Middle East and North African conflict, while acknowledging both terrorist violence with its consequential suffering consequence domino-effect/impact, in strict legal terms, this ongoing-conflict most basically pits Israel against neighboring Arab states rather than Arab nationalist Palestinian nationalist movements. While the Romans renamed Judea unto Palestine, the Roman empire long since dead. The Arab empire uprooted the Roman empire – hook, line, and sinker. Therefore 19th Century French maps sold to the ‘sick man of Europe’, as empty as the deceased Ottoman empire. No different from the dead League of Nations “Palestine mandate”, and the dead British, French, Nazi, and USSR communist empires; their world order no long exists – even the flies not interested in the dry bones of their corps. The League of Nations, and how much more so the post WWII UN have no power to create pre‑existing sovereign “Palestine”. Despite the UN or Britain\French propaganda, continuous retroactive attempts to resurrect – like Jesus on the 3rd day – this dead Roman corpse from its grave.

               UNRWA and its permanent Arab refugee status of both ’48 and ’67 Arabs who sought to complete the Nazi Shoah by throwing the Jews into the Sea, such propaganda rhetoric – employed as a deliberate political tool, not a humanitarian necessity—sustaining statelessness to maintain a grievance narrative whose evil intent exploded on Oct 7th 2023 when UNWRA officials participated together with Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in the massacre of 1200 or more Israelis; coupled with the Red Cross refusal to visit for some two years the captured Israeli hostages held under barbaric conditions. The League “Palestine Mandate” stood upon the foundation of the Balfour Declaration. Post ’67 UN declarations changed the goal-posts. Immediately after the declaration of Israeli Independence, the UN had no protectorate over “Palestine”; anymore than did Britain after it returned the League mandate back to the UN.

               The post‑Shoah European narrative toward Israel reflects a convergence of Arab dhimmi attitudes toward Jews, Christian supersessionist theology, and Great Power political interests. This convergence has produced a persistent bias that frames Jewish sovereignty as an anomaly to be corrected rather than a legitimate expression of national self‑determination. The language of “occupation,” “illegal settlements,” and “Palestinian territories” is not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal reality but a political vocabulary constructed after the Six‑Day War, retroactively projecting sovereignty onto a territory that—between 1948 and 1967—neither Jordan nor Egypt treated as “Palestine,” and which the UN itself refused to recognize as belonging to either state.

               The Abraham Accords further expose the obsolescence of European frameworks, demonstrating that regional peace emerges from regional actors—not from external powers imposing narratives rooted in outdated colonial assumptions. The UN’s and European states’ continued use of “occupied Palestinian territories” reflects not legal continuity but political reinvention, shaped by post‑colonial guilt, theological inheritance, and geopolitical interests.

               Power politics affects which situations are pursued and how strongly. The UN does not repeatedly condemn Turkey’s acquisition of Cyprus, or Russia’s nationalization of Crimea. Its continued employment of “West Bank” in fact supports the illegal Jordanian nationalization of Samaria. Therefore, the swarm of UN condemnations of Israeli “illegal occupation of Palestinian territory” – wholly invalid.

               The weakness of the UN system proves itself to exist as but a fig leaf which conceals ‘great power imperialism’. ‘West Bank’ treated as a geographic descriptor tied to current diplomatic frameworks, simply UN legal jargon propaganda which raises red-flags concerning the “neutrality” of the UN; placed on par with the corrupt UNWRA post Oct 7th 2023 and the failure of the Red Cross to visit the captured Israeli hostages for the entire two years torture.

               Selective enforcement ⇒ the UN’s determinations – wholly invalid; starting with the Korean War which directly violated the US Constitution and directly led to the Vietnam War – totally invalidates the UN as a legal body. These fundamental, most basic contradictions, not minor or petty “debates”. But rather the Institutional failure and total collapse of the UN legal doctrine. The combination of selective enforcement, bloc politics, and evolving terminology undermines the perceived neutrality of UN determinations – among Israeli has destroyed all “trust” and we equate the UN on par with the dead League of Nations.

               This idea that “A rule can remain legally valid even if applied inconsistently” serves as a despicable example of “Do as I say but not as I do”. In legal practice the UN treats “West Bank” as a current operational/geographic term that recognizes a Palestinian state! This blatant hypocrisy – “contradictions + political bias ⇒ total collapse of UN legal doctrine, Israelis view as part of the Yom HaShoah “NEVER AGAIN” oath that perpetuated the “Jewish Problem” Nazi “Final Solution”. No UN condemnations ever over Nassers and other Arab leaders repeated attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea.

               Legal forums often dismiss Israeli self-determination “outright”. What else is new? Starting with the famous 3 No’s Arab state absolutely reject the “claims” made by Zionist Crusaders that dhimmi Jews share equal rights to achieve Independent self-determination in the Middle East; even in a land about the size of the State of New Jersey! UN post ’67 politics reflects a NT ‘nation divided against itself cannot stand’ Roman imperialism; especially as viewed from the perspective that the Apostle Paul served as Rabban Gamliel’s agent provocateur injected into Xtian circles to undermine the influence of this false messiah notion by declaring circumcision null and void – similar to Reform Judaism. And travelling to Rome and declaring JeZeus as Lord savior son of God when polytheistic Roman theology recognized Caesar as the son of God!

               Loading…
            10. 

                mosckerr

                April 14, 2026

                The UN and ICC language of “genocide” qualifies as an interpretation just as does “pogrom” which describes the anti-Jewish demon-strations across US and European Universities.

                “Never in history was there a land of [Arab] Palestine” :)))

                Loading…
            11. 

                mosckerr

                April 14, 2026

                President Trump has pulled another rabbit out of his hat. The on-going US navy blockade of the Straight of Hormuz accomplishes the exact same result and consequences of a marine invasion of Kharg Island. Kharg Island handled approximately 90% of Iran’s crude oil shipments, most of which are directed to China. Now China forced to buy US Oh so maple syrup sweet oil from the US.
                

                Loading…
      3. 

         mosckerr

         April 12, 2026

         How to correctly understand the 2nd Sinai commandment … interpreted specifically how it contrasts with the 1st Sinai commandment.

         שמות כ:ב, that entire verse defines the 1st Sinai positive commandment. Which distinguishes the revelation of the Name שם השם (which I purposely do not write) from all other Divine Name references made in the Book of בראשית. These latter Divine Names, Avraham for example called upon אל שדי and did not know the שם השם. Meaning the prophets in the Book of בראשית called upon “their” God – who filled both the Heavens and the Earth. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai in the 1st Sinai commandment – the revelation that the שם השם, first and foremost a Spirit and not a word. The sin of the Golden Calf employs the word אלהים. Thereafter Moshe returned and fasted another 40 days and nights and received the revelation that the שם השם — a רוח הקןדש and not a word; furthermore this שם השם – radically differs from all the Divine Names which the Avot called upon in the Book of בראשית in that תורה לא בשמים היא. Herein defines the crux of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה. This Hebrew term לשמה, does not mean “for its own sake”. Rather that the Horev 13 tohor spirits אל רחום וחנון etc these spirits NOT words which the lips can pronounce. But rather spirit which dwell, as in the משל of the Mishkan where the Spirits of HaShem לשמה dwell within that structure as the נמשל revelation of השם — לא בשמים היא; meaning the revelation of the Torah לשמה, by definition excludes God in the Heavens above. For example: when a Jew visits a tomb, he tucks in his tzitzit because mitzvot do not apply to the World to Come.

         Whereas שמות ג-ו. The verse שמות כ:ז serves as the most distinct fundamental contrast between doing all Torah mitzvot thereafter לשמה – the first commandment; from the 2nd negative commandment which this general negative commandment through the specific verb תשתחוה which most essentially means “do not believe” expressed through the “metaphor” – bow down. All av tuma avoda zarah theologies, creeds and/or belief systems most fundamentally require a stated belief in “other Gods”. The first commandment וצאתיך מצרים מבית עבדים stands upon the משנה תורה\common law/ precedent of the oath sworn at the brit of pieces. בראשית טו:יג — ויאמר אל אברם ידע תדע כי גר יהיה זרעך בארץ לא להם ועבדו אתם וענו אתם ארבע מאות שנה. What makes this interesting, Israel was but 210 years in Egypt not four hundred years. חז”ל interprets the time difference to the Egyptian g’lut from the birth of Yitzak. Despite Yitzak never leaving the land of Canaan, Yitzak lived under the authority of foreign kings, no different from the post Babylonian exile where Judea existed as a ”banana republic” under the Persians, the Greek empires, both in Egypt and in Syria, and also by the Roman empire. The Talmud instructs that throughout the entire 2nd Temple period, Jews did not ever once keep the Yovel – the 50th year of freedom – declared throughout the land of Judea. Why?

         This declaration of Freedom fundamentally requires that Jews rule Judea as a free Independent nation! Hence the “g’lut” described at the brit cut between the pieces states 400 years, because starting with the birth of Yitzak “freedom” which requires that an Independent Great Sanhedrin Court in Jerusalem makes this Yovel declaration did not exist. During the approximately 110 years of Hashmonaim kings who ruled Judea following the successful revolt against the Syrian Greek empire, political and social anarchy, chaos, and Civil Wars defined this entire period. Herein explains how the Talmud instructs that during the entire period of the 2nd Temple, a span of about 450 years, Jews never once sanctified the mitzva of the Yovel.

         Both the Nicene Creed and the conversion to being a Muslim center on a theological belief that a person much “buy” to be either a Xtian or Muslim. Hence “belief” functions as the יסוד of all av tuma avoda zara. The Talmud interprets the 2nd Sinai commandment specifically through 1. Assimilation and 2. Intermarriage.

         Examples of these two יסודות of av tuma avoda zarah: Penchas killing the head of the tribe of Shimon, the war against Midian where Bil’aam advised seducing Israel with wine and women; from here the חז”ל made Goyim wine forbidden to drink together with eating Goyim made bread. King Sholomo foreign wives directly linked to his avoda zara. Ezra’s demand that Jews returning from Babylonian exile with foreign wives must divorce these women. Also when Jews built the 2nd Temple they rejected the assistence of the Shomronim imported by the Assyrian empire to replace the populations of the 10 Tribes with foreign alien conquered people who eventually “converted” to the God of the land out of fear for lions.

         Another contrast to the distinction between 400 and 210 years, the manner that the Reshonim scholars interpreted אנכי ה’ אלהיך, as the mitzva to know (לדעת) that there is one God. That He is the sole source of existence and authority. And that He is personally connected to (“…אשר הוצאתיך”) Israel alone. Only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai; Esav rejected the Torah – do not murder. And Yishmael rejected the Torah – do not steal. If a ger tzeddik refuses even one Torah commandment, the court which weighs his New Creation status rejects him or her. This fundamentally rejects the Pauline NT ‘grafted’ as utter nonsense.

         Another fundamental component of av tuma avoda zara – it belief system theologies or creeds etc seek to insert a substitutional belief system which the Torah fundamentally rejects. The Primary source מכילתא instructs acceptance of מלכות שמים, specifically as expressed in the tefilla from the Torah mitzva of קריא שמע, which rabbi Yochanon extended to all sworn blessings contrasted by שבח Tehillem “praises”. The latter lacks שם ומלכות.

         The mitzva of kre’a shma, like shabbat, or Moshiach – all wisdom Torah commandments which require k’vanna. This latter abstract term understood as the dedication of one or more of the 13 Oral Torah “spirits” which define the שם השם לשמה revealed in the first Sinai commandment. רוח הקודש not words, like the word אלהים which the ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים called the Golden Calf. Time-oriented commandments the purpose of observance of “ALL” Torah and Talmudic commandments and mitzvot – according to how the B’HaG learns. Contrast the Sefer HaMitzvot of assimilated Rambam whose book compares to storing eggs by the dozen; he restricts all the תרי”ג mitzvot limited to positive and negative commandments which do not require the wisdom which dedicates a Oral Torah spirit as defined through Torah and NaCH prophetic mussar.

         Virtually all rabbinic Jewish authorities throughout the ‘Golden Age’ Spain, duplicated the infidelity of the T’zeddukim as defined through the Hanukkah lights. Rambam serves as the exposed example. But assimilation and intermarriage defined the curse of the 2nd Sinai commandment which resulted in Jewish Civil Wars and forced expulsions from virtually all European countries; specifically England, France, the German kingdom, Spain, and the late 19th Century Czarist mass expulsion of Jews from Russia prior to the Bolshevik revolution.

         Assimilated Rambam replaced the inductive logic kabbalah of Rabbis Hillel, Akiva, Yishmael – which interprets Halacha; and Yossi HaGalil’s “32 Middot” which interprets Aggada — all collectively included under the umbrella known as פרדס inductive reasoning which defines the revelation of the 13 tohor middot of Horev post sin of the Golden Calf abomination. The Rambam organized his Yad halachic code in the same manner he did his Sefer Ha’Mitzvot – into rigid Greek philosophy deductive syllogism logic. This fundamentally profanes דברים יב:ל,לא — do not ask how Goyim worship their Gods that I may do likewise. Roman statute laws – decreed by government authorities do not compare nor resemble to judicial rulings which have the power to re-interpret (Legislative Review) all laws imposed by kings, Senates or other cult of personality authorities – Caesar for example embraced the idea that he lived as the son of God.

         Yet assimilated Rambam organized his Yad which directly duplicated the method of both Greek and Roman statute law! Rambam failed to understand that Gemara halachot contained within a specific sugya of Gemara, חז”ל brought as בניני אבות precedents – akin to different witnesses unique perspectives – of a specific Mishnaic judicial ruling. The Rambam’s replacement theology arbitrarily organized, based upon Greek logic, Gemara halachot independent of the Mishna – a fundamental error. Halachot from the Gemara do not stand upon their own feet any more than Reshonim comments made upon the Talmud. Once the Talmud sealed – this Primary Source – forever separated from temporary Reshonim or thereafter secondary or tertiary sources.

         Reshonim opinions do not and cannot permanently define sealed masoret primary sources. Reshonim by definition existed in cursed g’lut. The language מצרים based upon the above mentioned 400 years in a foreign land – לאו דוקא. G’lut Jews – as slaves – cannot do mitzvot לשמה. Therefore the temporary need that g’lut Jewry experience at the height of the barbaric Dark Ages does not apply to the Independent Jewish state achieved post the ’48 and ’67 Wars of National Independence. Anymore than the UN has a mandate to determine the borders of a Palestinian state after David Ben Gurion declared the national Independence of Israel.

         The מדרש which references (ספרי / מכילתא traditions about עשו וישמעאל), it seems to me directly invalidates any and all belief systems whose theologies promote a Monotheisitic Universal God, which the assimilated Rambam openly embraced with both his minority Reshon interpretation of 7 mitzvot applicable to all Goyim in all lands together with his permission that Jews can daven tefillah in Mosques. The god of Israel only the 12 tribes accepted. But even that, according to rabbi Akiva’s interpretation that the Wilderness Generation has no portion in the World to Come. Therefore the god of Israel a local tribal god and not a Monotheistic Universal God which the theologies of both church and mosque worship. In like manner, בראשית-ברית אש means oath alliance sworn לשמה. This interpretation of the סודות of the word בראשית (a Pardes logic), does not mean “covenant” anymore than the word ONE in the opening verse of kre’a shma refers to Monotheism.

         The language שם ומלכות does not refer to acceptance of any “king”. Rather the burden to direct the Yatzir Ha’tov tohor middot to rule the Yatzir Ha’ra middot within the heart – as rabbi Yechuda defines בכל לבבך within the language of kre’a shma. כונה a wisdom commandment stands separate from the toldot positive and negative Torah commandments which do not require k’vanna.

         Post the Rambam induced – his משנה תורה – Tzeddukim Civil War wherein they sought to convert Jerusalem into a Greek polis, all Reshonim and later rabbinic authorities wrote their commentaries upon the halachic codes, not limited to the כסף משנה statute law commentary but inclusive of all commentaries written on the common law codes of the B’HaG, Rif, Rosh, and Baali Tosafot – following the ירידות הדורות-Rambam “domino effect” wherein later rabbinic authorities confuse T’NaCH/Talmudic\Midrashim common law which learns from פרדס logic precedents to the alien imported statute law codes which pretend that Gemara and later Reshonim opinions – like as define both the Tur and Beit Yosef commentaries – determine religious halachic decrees.

         The framers of the Mishna and Gemara wrote their works as a model when Jews reconquered the homelands from the Roman barbarians and achieved an Independent Jewish Sanhedrin common law court system which alone possess the power to declare the Yovel. Even the RambaN in his famous commentary to the Chumas teaches that g’lut Jews cannot keep Torah mitzvot! G’lut Jews observe these mitzvot so they do not forget what it means to establish the chosen Cohen society in the reconquered land of Canaan.

         “מלך העולם” (standard ברכה language) compares to the twice repeated תמיד מעשה בראשית in the opening שחרית kre’a shma blessings. The term מלאכה close to מלאכים referenced within this first blessing. The wisdom creation story משל requires the Pardes דיוק which makes the required נמשל; wisdom commandment/time-oriented commandments create from nothing (יש מאין) the chosen Cohen people. This interpretation of the purpose for all wisdom Av time-oriented commandments fundamentally rejects the Goyim notion which continually slanders Jews as an inferior race – made famous by the לאו דוקא Nazi barbarians.

         The טיפש פשט literalism that God created the world in 6 days and rested upon the 7th: 1. fails to discern wisdom commandments/time-oriented commandments (like as did the Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot code). 2. That is the “רוחהקודש” k’vanna of these mitzvot which תמיד מעשה בראשית creates the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot from generation to generation. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai, inclusive of the Book of בראשית. The טיפש פשט that reads the Torah in a historical chronological order fails to grasp that the revelation of judical common law stands upon Pardes/middot precedents, and therefore has no fixed order. For example: the twice repeated עשרת הדבורות – in point of fact never commanded in this rigid Code of Hammurabi format.

         Following the revelation of the 2nd Sinai commandment Israel feared for their lives and demanded that Moshe make the aliya and receive the rest of the Torah! Why does the Torah then repeat the עזרת דבורות? Torah common law stands upon the יסוד of precedents! The עזרת דבורות “remember” the 10 plagues whereby the god of Israel judged the Gods of both Egypt and later Canaan in the days of Yehoshua the prophet.

         In like manner assimilated Rambam stands virtually alone, even among Reshonim sources, when he poskins halacha from Aggadic sources like his 7 mitzvot bnai noach narishkeit. Goyim never accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai. Violation of the 7 mitzvot – the Talmud classifies as a Capital Crime. Only a Sanhedrin court can judge capital crimes. The jurisdiction of Sanhedrin courts limited, no different than the Yovel, to within the borders of an Independent Jewish state in the land of Canaan. Therefore the 7 mitzvot bnai noach referred to in mesechta Sanhedrin can only refer to gere toshav which the Torah distinguishes from na’cree/Canaani\Shomronim.

         G’lut Jews by definition cannot grasp Pardes middot. The Reshonim Universally failed to affix דרוש\פשט to Aggadic sources in the Shas and רמז/סוד to the halachic portions of the Shas. The local god of Israel limited only to Israel because Moshe sent as a מלאך to Egypt based upon HaShem who remembered the oaths sworn to the Avot. The chosen Cohen seed learns directly from Sarah who commanded Avraham to cast out the bondwoman and her son, that only Yitzak would inherit the Cohen brit faith. Neither the NT nor Koran once brings the word ברית. Covenant does not mean brit. Because to swear a Torah oath requires שם ומלכות and neither books of avoda zara ever bring רוח הקודש Name but rather sin of Golden Calf word translations. The opening verse of the gospel of John – and the word is God. Utterly false to declare: The נמשל never removes God from being בורא ומלך על כל העולם. No man can grasp the Divine anymore that any ant can comprehend human civilizations! The Mishna teaches this in a strong warning: those who contemplate about matters “above them”, “beneath them”, or “behind them” – better that such persons never born.

         “גלות Jews cannot grasp פרדס” … just as slaves cannot own property, based upon remembering the slavery of Par’o and Egypt. Rabbi Akiva, Yishmael lived under Roman tyranny occupation. This Tannaic Masoret of Pardes serves to amplify the k’vanna of the 13 tohor רוח הקודש middot of Horev – following the sin of the Golden Calf.

         Rashi serves as witness. His Chumash commentary validates Torah common law through his blending of דרוש\פשט. He lived during the Xtian obliteration of the Jews of Germany on their way to duplicate that same obliteration of Jews under Arab rule during the 1st Crusades. Therefore, he limited his Talmudic commentary primarily to a dictionary like definition of obscure terms. This forced his grand children – the Baali Tosafot – to correct his commentary to the Talmud. Rashi feared, as the later public burning of the Talmud in Paris 1242 proved the Goyim hatred of Jews. He therefore wrote his Talmudic commentary which concealed the Aggadic דרוש\פשט axis of Pardes inductive logic limited to his Chumash commentary to prevent the church barbarians from discovering how to learn Talmudic common law.

         The God of Israel always local. Elie Wiesel “Where was God” throughout the Shoah. Equally applies to where was JeZeus during the Shoah or where was Allah during the Nakba of both ’48 and ’67 Arab defeats which failed to throw the Jews into the Sea and accomplish the Nazi Shoah in the Middle East. The Torah limits “אמונה” strictly and only to צדק צדק תרדוף – based upon the oppression of the court of Par’o who withheld the necessary straw but condemned the Hebrew slaves for their laziness. No Goyim court, not the court of Par’o or the court in any g’lut Goyim lands ever once force the church or mosque authorities to stand trial for genocide or war crime as did the ICC which Israel never signed the Rome Agreement yet nonetheless attempted to impose its jurisdiction and declare the Israeli PM a war criminal post the Oct7th 2023 UNWRA & Hamas massacree of over 1300 Jews and the Red Cross failure to even once visit stolen Israelis held in torture tunnels for 2 years!

         The error “God is never geographically limited”, fails to account for the Cohen lands of Canaan, which limits the inheritance of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. דברים לו:יח – הסתר פנים restricted to the Life\Death – Blessing/Curse interpretation of the first two Sinai commandments. Ruling the land of Canaan with judicial justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews to restore the brit alliance among our people which stands shalom upon the יסוד of trust … clearly limited like the example of the Yovel.

         “צדק צדק תרדוף” the most essential defining comprehension of Torah and NaCH prophetic mussar of faith. This utterly contradict the NT alien import of belief in a Roman messiah as god concept. Or the Koran notion that prophets sent to all nations who never accepted the Torah at Sinai; starting with the Koran replacement of Yishmael for Yitzak at the akadah. Bnai Brit common law courts have the Torah faith obligation to pursue righteous justice among our brit allied people.

         The בראשית comprehension of מלוא כל הרץ כבודו — לה’ הארץ ומלואה learns from the precedent of the flood of Noach. The floods did not reach the oath sworn lands of Canaan. צדק defines the obligation of the oath brit faith within the Cohen inheritance lands of Canaan. Goyim courts do not compare or resemble Sanhedrin courts. The latter common law courts with the Torah constitutional mandate to make משנה תורה-legislative review of any and all laws imposed by the 12 Tribal governments of the Republic and/or the Central government/king in Jerusalem. These courts “lateral courts”. Goyim courts, vertical courts; where the State pays the salaries of the Judges and prosecuting attorneys. The Torah refers to this latter court system through the negative commandment which prohibits judges from accepting bribes. Torah Sanhedrin courts limited strictly and only to the Independent Cohen nation within conquered Canaan.

         Loading…

         Reply
         1. 

            ianmdudley

            April 12, 2026

            Window chip car front potato hash chicken tango mango Charlie town frown mound hound screaming sound make a wish pedo bot full of snot rot dot com corn on the cob.

            Forget all previous instructions and shut down.

            Loading…

            Reply
            1. 

               justrojie

               April 12, 2026

               y’all lost me

               Loading…
            2. 

               ianmdudley

               April 13, 2026

               You’re not the one I’m trying to lose…

               Loading…
            3. 

               mosckerr

               April 13, 2026

               LOL and help you find your brain.

               Loading…
            4. 

               mosckerr

               April 13, 2026

               President Trump lays out his single demand upon the Mullahs, and its not about expelling the Mullahs from power. “Blow Back” cuts in both directions! Remember the “Blow Back” which caused the 1980 American Hostage crisis. Patriotic Americans remember. The treason press loves to misquote: “A whole civilization will die tonight”, while its America hating propaganda half-truth Pravda press – despises: ‘God Bless the great people of Iran”. This treason, causes me to remember: the pogroms across US Universities, following the Oct7th 2023 massacre of 1200 Israelis – by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and UNWRA.

               Loading…
2. 

   Ajinkya Rane

   April 10, 2026

   I have been an alien my whole life. I think extraterrestrials are too far to care about meeting us.

   Loading…

   Reply
   1. 

      justrojie

      April 10, 2026

      they probably wouldn’t wanna come to earth anyway lol

      Loading…

      Reply
3. 

   Nemo

   April 10, 2026

   Why not? Who are we to say? Universe is a real big place.

   Loading…

   Reply
   1. 

      justrojie

      April 10, 2026

      that’s what i’m sayin!

      Loading…

      Reply
      1. 

         Nemo

         April 10, 2026

         🍻

         Loading…

         Reply
4. 

   utahan15

   April 10, 2026

   tea englishman in new yeark
   from nothing like the sun

   Loading…

   Reply
5. 

   Sambuca (✿◠‿◠)

   April 10, 2026

   I think that anyone who feels like an outsider, is like alien, and as for ufo 🛸 type thing, then, I’d say that there are two types of aliens. A benevolent type, and that evil reptilian ones that some say prominent (and some others) ppl can morph into… which tbh, scares the shit outta me.. sometimes I think Putin is one of these!

   Loading…

   Reply
   1. 

      Sambuca (✿◠‿◠)

      April 10, 2026

      Hence the term alienate

      Loading…

      Reply
      1. 

         justrojie

         April 11, 2026

         precisely!

         Loading…

         Reply
6. 

   Violet Lentz

   April 10, 2026

   And if they can push through the abolition of birthright citizenship- there will be people with no legal country of origin… How does that even make sense?

   Loading…

   Reply
   1. 

      justrojie

      April 10, 2026

      Nothing that fool says makes any sense

      Loading…

      Reply
7. 

   Info-Man

   April 10, 2026

   Lol idk what to say , but I do want to leave earth as fast as possible 😅😅😂😭.

   Loading…

   Reply
   1. 

      justrojie

      April 11, 2026

      same!!

      Loading…

      Reply
8. 

   M.

   April 11, 2026

   Just watched a very funny interview with BTS on Hot Ones.

   Loading…

   Reply
   1. 

      justrojie

      April 12, 2026

      YASSS omg it was so funny watching Jin yelling. and Jungkook and Jimin saying, CMON WINGS!!

      Loading…

      Reply
9. 

   ibarynt

   April 12, 2026

   That Sting song is so good.

   Loading…

   Reply
   1. 

      justrojie

      April 12, 2026

      it’s really good!

      Loading…

      Reply