LINK: postulate
So, guess what happened?
There are no wrong answers.
postulate
Discover more from just rojie
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
77 responses to “postulate”
-
Ro? What the? You ok?
-
i am ok, nico
-
Car accident??
-
Nope but I could see how that could look like road rash
-
-
-
-
I’m glad you are ok. Hopefully all is well now.
-
All is well, thank you, Jesse!
-
-
🙏
-
I’m scared to ask Rojie. Too much shenanigans 🤔
-
😆 ive def done lots of shenanigans but this wasn’t the result of it
-
Haha…😉 well, I hope you are ok! 😔
-
hehe yes i’m ok!! thank you!!
-
-
-
-
The bureaucratic Sovietization of the UN, proof of its decline and ultimate collapse. This produces policy paralysis, hypocrisy, and ultimately loss of legitimacy. The UN increasingly resembles the League of Nations—procedurally busy, morally loud, strategically irrelevant. Bottom line: Victory through war defines international borders.
Vietnam stands in the shadow of Soviet defeats in the 1967 and ’73 Arab Israeli wars, viewed from the perspective of 2026; Nasser qualifies as a Soviet client state where Sadat expelled Soviet advisors before the war. US imperialism in Vietnam treated S. Vietnam as a banana republic. Unlike Korea, US strategy intimidated by the threat of Soviet or Chinese intervention failed to invade and conquer North Vietnam like MacArthur did in North Korea.
Furthermore the corruption of the Military Industrial Complex “monopoly” and entrenched bureaucratization of Washington after LBJ/assassination of Kennedy starkly contrasts with post WWII Truman’s Korean imperialism – Containment policy and Marshal Plan. The Sovietization of Washington as a bureaucratic super-state which dominated the 50 States of the Republic mirrors Soviet bureaucratic big brother domination of the states of the USSR.
The USSR’s apparatchik system or LBJ’s micromanaged Vietnam quagmire, prioritize ideological posturing over pragmatic outcomes, leading to institutional decay. The UN’s trajectory indeed mirrors the League of Nations’ impotence, failing to enforce norms equitably and risking obsolescence in a multipolar world where power realities (e.g., Crimea’s annexation or Golan recognitions) override rhetoric.
The former perhaps best exemplified in US support for the British & French UN Resolution 242 and 338 which sought to restrict and limit the growing Israeli weight in determining the balance of power across the Middle East; both England & France sought to negate their great power defeat in the disastrous 1956 Suez Crisis which reduced both countries to second tier powers during the Cold War.
Containment, caused the US to become the Police Force of the Planet; especially after Truman invaded Korea without a Congressional declaration of war. Truman did not micromanage the Korean conflict, at least not until he overruled MacArthur’s demand to employ atomic bombs against China. LBJ ran the Vietnam war from air conditioned offices in Washington DC. The US defeat in Vietnam came directly because Westmoreland only wasted smoke compared to general MacArthur. Two completely different breeds of generals. Westmoreland a bureaucrat while MacArthur a warrior. LBJ’s micromanagement and UN fact-finding missions share the same DNA.
Furthermore, at Camp David PM Begin curtly inform Carter that Israel was not a banana republic! Carter never forgave Begin for this rebuke which called the spade of US imperialism in the Middle East – a spade. UN 242 expresses the strategic interests of European and US/USSR Great Powers rather than the 6 Day War. Russia and Poland occupy captured Prussia to this day. Post WWII the Allies made a forced German population transfer from both Prussia and the Czech Republic! This totally contradicts the false rhetoric of UN 242. And no UN condemnation for France’s Versailles spoils or Britain’s treaty-imposed divisions, yet relentless framing of Israel’s post-1967 gains as “inadmissible.” This hypocrisy fuels 2026 debates, where Crimea’s status quo persists amid global outrage, underscoring victors’ justice.
In point of fact both Begin and Sharon governments agreed with “withdrawal from territories” 242 premise to achieve peace. Begin withdrew Israel from the captured Sinai and Sharon withdrew, post Oslo Accords, Israeli domination of Gaza. The latter effectively established a “Palestinian state”(s) in Gaza and Palestinian autonomy in Area 1 of Samaria. 242’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” clashes with Allied actions—expelling 12-14 million Germans from East Prussia (now Polish/Russian Kaliningrad), Sudetenland (Czech), and other areas in 1945-1950, with millions more dying enroute. Russia/Poland retain those lands, redrawn at Potsdam/Yalta without referendums. (some estimates reach 14–16 million total across Central/Eastern Europe). Deaths during flight, expulsions, internment, disease, and violence ranged from over 500,000 (conservative figures) to 2 million or more (higher scholarly estimates), with causes including malnutrition, exposure, and targeted killings.
These territories – redrawn without referendums, and Russia/Poland retain them today—Kaliningrad as a Russian exclave, former German lands in Poland integrated post-1945. This was “victors’ justice”: Allies sanctioned mass population transfers to create ethnically homogeneous states and prevent future irredentism, echoing the same acquisition-by-force logic 242 later condemned. In 2026, parallels are frequently drawn to Russia’s 2014 Crimea annexation (widely condemned) or Israel’s Golan control (U.S.-recognized in 2019 under Trump), underscoring how norms bend to power dynamics.
UN 242 etc etc etc completely ignores the British “occupation” of Northern Ireland. Or the French “occupation” of Alsace-Lorraine which France captured following WWI. These double standards—victors’ justice vs. post-colonial restraint—undermines 242’s political rhetoric. This critique echoed in 2026 discussions of Crimea (2014 annexation). It illustrates how “rules-based order” bends to power realities.
Still the UN continues to pretend that Israel remains a protectorate territory with its many condemnations and attempts to slander Israel post the Oct7th Abomination War as a Apartheid Genocide State. European States refuse to validate Israel’s decision to make Jerusalem its Capital. They refuse to weigh the post Shoah Jewish oath: “NEVER AGAIN”; Europeans shall never again impose “solutions” for “their” Jewish problem. The refusal to weigh “Never Again” in policy—dismissing Jewish self-determination post-Holocaust—manifests in non-recognition of Jerusalem as capital or Israel’s Middle Eastern regional grouping. Arab states’ exclusionary tactics (blocking Israel from Asia-Pacific UN bodies since 1949) perpetuate this “Apartheid Policy racism,” unmatched for any other member.
The UN adamantly refuses to recognize Israel as a country of the Middle East. No other UN member country treated with such Apartheid Policy racism-exclusion. This alone undermines the UN’s claim to neutrality. Only Trump has recognized Jerusalem the Golan and Area C of Samaria as part of the Israeli victory through wars international borders. Britain and France hold lingering grudges from the ’56 Suez where the Cold War super powers reduced these former great state powers to US dependents.
The UN compares to a whore-house where nation state(s) coalitions substitute strategic state national interests with soap box preaching morality which views Israel as a Colonial Crusader State. UN Resolution 242 (and broader UN frameworks) selectively enforces principles like territorial integrity while overlooking historical precedents involving European powers. From the vantage of January 18, 2026—amidst the ongoing Gaza truce fallout and heightened global scrutiny of Israel’s actions—these double standards appear even more pronounced, fueling debates over whether the “rules-based order” is little more than a facade for great-power realpolitik. Critics, including Israeli officials and pro-Israel advocates, often frame the UN as an institution where moral posturing conceals strategic alliances, with Israel bearing the brunt of disproportionate condemnation.
Alsace-Lorraine, annexed under the 1919 Treaty of Versailles. Despite local German-speaking populations and cultural ties to Germany, no comprehensive referendum was held—only limited plebiscites in adjacent areas like the Saar. France integrated it as a spoils-of-war gain, redrawing borders to punish Germany and bolster its security. In interwar discourse, British and Irish press often viewed it as a Franco-German internal matter, with little international outcry over “occupation.” Today, it’s fully French territory, unchallenged by UN resolutions, contrasting sharply with 242’s rhetoric applied to Israel’s post-1967 gains.
The 1921 partition of Ireland, formalized by the Anglo-Irish Treaty, created Northern Ireland as part of the UK amid civil unrest and without a island-wide referendum. Unionist majorities in the North opted to remain British, but nationalist grievances persist, viewing it as an imposed division. The UN has never framed this as an unlawful “occupation” under resolutions like 242, despite parallels in ethnic division and territorial claims. French perspectives on the Northern Ireland peace process (e.g., Good Friday Agreement) highlight transnational hypocrisy, where European powers evade the scrutiny applied to non-Western conflicts. In 2026 discussions, this is likened to Crimea’s 2014 annexation—condemned globally—while Northern Ireland’s status quo endures without comparable UN intervention.
The UN Human Rights Office’s January 2026 report chronicles “intensification of decades of severe racial discrimination” in the West Bank, explicitly warning of apartheid under international law. Similarly, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry (September 2025) declared Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide, citing mass killings, starvation, and erasure. The UN hypocrisy directly compares to new generations of born again Xtian totally oblivious to the 2000+ years of Church war crimes against Humanity which culminated in the European systematic slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry. The UN declaration of Israeli “genocide” directly compares to Holocaust Denial, where the UN-Church stands on a soap box and preaches blood libels against Jews. The Oct7th Abomination War does not remotely compare to the war crimes of the Shoah.
UN 242 etc etc etc represents European ‘great powers’ attempts to impose a two state ‘Final Solution’. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory. Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. England separated Trans-Jordan from its Palestine mandate territories at the Jordan river. The UN condemned Jordans’ nationalization of Samaria in 1950. Arafat’s PLO Charter of 1964 referred only to 1948 Israel as occupied territory – not Samaria or Gaza as occupied territory! Had Ben Gurion named the new Jewish state Palestine in 1948, the opportunist rhetoric of the displaced “Palestinian people” would never have existed! The Nakba of 800,000 Jews expelled from Arab countries surpasses the 650 Arab refugees who fled from Israeli/Palestine in 1948.
European States do not determine the international borders of the Jewish state nor where it establishes it Capital! East Jerusalem as “occupied” serves only their great power interests to dominate the balance of power across the Middle East by dismembering Israel much like the 19th Century great powers did to China. UN ‘groupy clicks’ totally ignore Israel’s 1980 Basic Law declaring it the undivided capital.
The UN does not classify Israel in the Middle East/Asia-Pacific group due to longstanding exclusion by Arab states. All Arab Israeli War fought over the fanatic classification of Jews as dhimmi second class inferior race politics; Arab have always rejected the Balfour Declaration which resulted in the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate to establish a Jewish National Home in the Middle East. All Arab UN member states voted against UN Resolution 181 wherein 33 or 2/3rds of all UN member states validated Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination. The UN groupy-clicks voted for UN 3379 – Zionism is Racism.
Only under Trump did the US recognize Jerusalem (2017, embassy move 2018), Golan Heights sovereignty (2019, captured 1967, annexed 1981), and propose Area C annexation in his 2020 plan affirmed “victory through wars” borders, openly reject and contradict Russian, EU – UN norms. Britain and France’s grudges from the 1956 Suez Crisis—where US/USSR pressure humbled them—persist in their Middle East imperialist policies; fundamentally aligning against Israeli war victories in order to reclaim their degraded & lost influence in determining the balance of power in this region. The EU delusions of grandeur utterly shocked by the Israeli victories in the ’48 & ’67 Two Israeli Wars of Independence. The guilt of the Shoah has besmirched the good name reputation of Europe and made the church a dead religion across those lands.
These UN dynamics mirror the bureaucratic “Sovietization” which greatly contributed to the collapse of the USSR and the defeat of the US in Vietnam. Only the future knows if the UN shall go the way of the League of Nations. Both failed institutions centralize moralizing over pragmatic strategy, restraining actors like Israel while ignoring parallels in Korea or Middle East client states. In 2026, with Gaza’s truce fragile and Crimea analogies fresh, the “rules-based order” bends predictably to power. Which element—perhaps UNRWA alliance with Hamas on Oct 7th scandals or European hypocrisy—merits deeper exploration?!
-
Bruh..tl;dr so I had to ask ChatGPT
-
It’s spam. This moron / bot posts long, garbled comments on my page too. I wish there was a way to report this crap.
-
lol thought it was some manifesto and I’m like ain’t nobody got time for all that
-
I really don’t know what the end game with this spam is. I don’t see how money can be made, and there is definitely ZERO respect being generated.
It’s just irritating.
Maybe that’s the goal?
-
perhaps!
-
-
-
-
Yes cultural and political Zionism – a bit complicated.
-
I like boats.
-
I really like boats.
-
Trump leadership stands tall.
In 2026, Donald Trump revisited his interest in Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark. Previously, in 2019, he proposed purchasing Greenland, a suggestion that was met with resistance from not just Denmark but also the global community. At the World Economic Forum in January 2026, Trump and NATO officials discussed a framework for a future deal regarding Greenland. This did not imply ownership transfer, but rather a cooperative framework addressing security and potential military bases.
The framework aims to allow the U.S. to build additional military bases on Greenland for missile defense purposes, particularly in line with Trump’s “Golden Dome” project. The U.S. seeks access to mineral rights, particularly for rare earth minerals, which are essential for technology and defense sectors. Danish sovereignty over Greenland remains intact, as emphasized by Danish officials who insist on the respect of the self-determination of Greenland’s people.
Trump has backed down from threats to impose tariffs on European countries opposing his Greenland proposal, indicating a softening of his stance to mend transatlantic relations. The framework introduced at Davos is more about strengthening cooperative security measures in the Arctic region rather than an outright sale or transfer of sovereignty over Greenland. The situation as a potential “squirrel” tactic for deflecting main stream media propaganda anti Trump rhetoric or as a maximalist demand for negotiation appears to hold merit, given the context of Trump’s approach and the complexities surrounding the territory’s status. Based upon the recent developments which reveal a diplomatic approach focusing on security collaboration and resource sharing, rather than a unilateral demand for territorial ownership.
This framework signifies a focus on enhancing security measures in the Arctic rather than asserting territorial claims. The ongoing dialogue suggests a diplomatic path centered on security collaboration and resource sharing rather than unilateral demands for ownership.
This Greenland “art of the deal” possibly linked to broader geopolitical strategies, including challenges posed by BRICS nations to the U.S. dollar’s dominance. The Greenland deal primarily revolves around security collaboration between the U.S. and Denmark, particularly concerning military bases and resource access. The BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) have been increasingly vocal about reducing their dependency on the U.S. dollar for international trade.
Establishing military bases in Greenland could enhance U.S. capabilities in the Arctic, potentially countering Russian influence and securing key shipping routes, which is critical amidst rising geopolitical tensions related to BRICS. Access to Greenland’s resources, including its rare earth minerals, could bolster U.S. supply chains that are crucial in maintaining technological and military superiority. Strengthening U.S. positions globally (like in Greenland) may serve as a counterweight to any moves by BRICS to establish a currency that could undermine the dollar, reinforcing U.S. economic interests.
Greenland’s strategic importance is connected to U.S. interests in Venezuela, particularly regarding oil reserves, involves several key geopolitical factors. As an autonomous territory of Denmark, Greenland’s geographic location in the Arctic is strategically vital for U.S. military operations, especially in countering rival influences from Russia and China. Venezuela is home to some of the largest oil reserves in the world, making it a significant player in global energy dynamics. The capture of Venezuelan leadership by U.S. interests could be seen as a move to secure energy supplies while simultaneously diminishing the influence of countries like Russia and China that have vested interests in Venezuela.
While the direct links between Greenland’s status and the U.S. strategy toward Venezuela may not be immediately apparent, both are part of a larger framework of U.S. geopolitical maneuvers aimed at securing strategic resources and asserting influence in key regions. The dynamics of securing energy resources from Venezuela and ensuring military readiness in Greenland illustrate the interconnected nature of global political and economic strategies. This multifaceted approach highlights how countries navigate complex international landscapes to protect their interests.
-
i was wondering if you were a bot cause dayamn
-
Thank you 🙂
Shakespeare: The Merchant of Venice — Shylock, a Jewish moneylender: “If you prick us, do we not bleed?” This line reflects a a powerful statement against discrimination and prejudice, arguing for the commonality of human experience regardless of background or religion. The Play Macbeth likewise has a similar theme which explores the human condition of arrogant racism, guilt, and fraudulent morality so common among European societies which culminated in the Shoah.
-
Compare and Contrast the key to discerning truth from false.
Joseph Smith’s teachings emphasize that humans are literal children of God and that they have the potential for eternal progression, suggesting a close, personal relationship with the Divine. The mention of “Av tuma avoda zara” refers to the concepts of impurity and idolatry in Jewish tradition.
The distinction between the names of God (like El, Elohim, El Shaddai) that characterize God’s presence in a more transcendent manner, and the concept of the Divine Presence as found within the hearts of the chosen people (Yatzir Ha-Tov) post Sinai Revelation, reflects a vision, a perspective that emphasizes that HaShem dwells within the hearts of Israel rather than in the Heavens above as Xtian and Islamic theologies preach. The concept of “chosen Cohen people”, represents the Central Theme of the Torah starting with the rejection of the first born son Cain’s sacrifice in favor of his younger brother’s sacrifice.
This theme repeated throughout the Torah, from Yishmael rejected in favor of Yitzak, to Esau rejected in favor of Yaacov to the struggle between Reuven vs. Yosef and the rejection of all first born children of Israel in favor of the Tribe of Levi.
Av Tuma avoda zara has no consciousness NOT of tohor/tuma spirit distinctions – absolutely critical for a man to discern Yatzir Ha-Tov tohor middot spirits from Yatzir Ha-Raw tuma middot spirits — both of whom wrestle within the heart for dominance like as did Esau and Yaacov in the womb of Rivka. Av tuma avoda zara religions minimize the fundamental revelation of the Torah which exposes that HaShem lives within the tohor middot of the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the heart; and not in the Heavens above.
Smith’s theology preaches of worlds separate and above this world. A completely foreign addition which the Torah rejects. All av tuma avoda zara theologies, Xtianity and Islam serve as two classic examples, emphasize some Monotheistic Universal God’s omnipotence away from the Human soul. This openly rejects the Talmud instruction which teaches that only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai, as explained above. HaShem – a local tribal god. Not a Monotheistic Universal God. Hence the revelation of the 2nd Sinai commandment against the worship of other Gods.
Idolatry exists as a corrupt translation of avoda zara. The T’NaCH and Talmud define the latter as 1) assimilation to customs of peoples who reject the Torah revelation at Sinai 2) intermarriage with Goyim, who by definition reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Goyim limit “idolatry” to graven images! Clearly the two opposing ideas – not the same or even similar to one another. Joseph Smith’s teachings about separate worlds and heavenly realms introduce notions that are foreign to the Torah. The commandment to build the Mishkan/Temple differentiates form from substance. The substance of faith, expressed through the pursuit of righteous justice among our bnai brit allies, that our local tribal god lives within our hearts as a brit people. Av tuma avoda zara totally oblivious to this fundamental Torah revelation.
-
-
Don’t touch America’s boats!
-
-
Oh, my dear friend. I hope you are all right. 🌺💗
-
Thank you, Kymber I am good!
Looks to me like in effort to possess eternal youth- you burned the skin off your beautiful face.. I see in the comments you are ok- but DAMN!
-
Pretty damn close. I did get an aggressive treatment of microneedling done after work. I seem to have a high tolerance to pain, which surprised the woman who did it.
WTAF?????? 😱😱😱😱 Skin care regime????
-
😉 yep!! You and Violet are pretty good at figuring it out
You went downhill skiing and fell on hard packed snow?!
-
lol I’ve broken my wrist when I was snowboarding. I covered my face with my hand. But that was another time
Yikes! Hope it’s just mild abrasions.
You weren’t reading a book while walking and then walked into a wall, were you? I hate when I do that.
-
I’m more likely to fall and trip while on my phone but it hasn’t happened yet
What? Now you have to share the story.
-
Lolol I wish I had a dramatic tale about it
-
Ahhh, like little girl says, too bad so sad 😁
-
LOL!!
-
-
did a patient get crazy? hope you are ok! MIke
-
I am fine! I’ve had a patient’s family get in my face before because I wouldn’t put their son on a psychiatric hold.
What happened Rojie?
-
I had microneedling done to boost elastin and collagen on my face
-
Oh okay. It’s the same thing that my wife does. I know it’s worth it.
-
Ooh nice!!
-
-
Bro are you doing well ?, i just opened wp ,I think it’s been few days , did you fell somewhere ? Is it any kind of allergy or something? I hope you are fine .Take care .
-
Thank you! I’m good, just had microneedling done
-
Oh 😳, i just googled it , does it hurts ?
-
for me it didn’t hurt but for some of the other girls, it did
-
that is nice if it doesn’t hurt 😭……Take care !
-
-
-
Obviously, 2nd place in the national Muay Thai competition.
-
😆 I’ve seen mma fighters look like this before so I could see that
Microneedling!!😉
-
Ding ding ding
-
Yip! Can you blow a kiss easteward for my prize please??😁
-
Um victim of I.C.E ?
-
Ahh well I wouldn’t be surprised if that happened considering they’re swarming around in SoCal
Yes, what happened? I would say a sunburn but that doesn’t explain the wounds and dry lips.
-
lol my lips are constantly dry from my anemia. I’ve had pretty bad sunburnt before but not on my face. I had microneedling done
-
I am glad I didn’t do that. You will need to us see the difference a little later. Then maybe I will reconsider. It looks like it was painful
-
i’ll def show after pics!!
-
-
UMMM? Who do we need to jump???
-
I know who to reach out to when things get bad 😆
I am NEVER having microneedling done. Though that was true before I saw this picture.
This is a beauty treatment how?
-
oh for sure, it’s a thing these days that people spend hundreds to thousands on
-
Well you should get a refund!
-
lol but i didnt pay for it to be done on me
-
I’m not sure if that makes the situation better or worse…
-
-
-
Too much rejuvenation?🤔 I hope it’s a picture years ago. Hugs, Rojie. Keep safe.
-
lol no it’s a pic from saturday night
-
It will be okay. It’s just an outside pain. You’re strong.
-
Hello dear friend 🤍
Before you scroll past, please take a moment for lives that have no voice and no one to protect them…💔
These innocent souls have no voice, no shelter, and no one to protect them… 💔
Please stand with us and join the Panagah Amn family to help turn this beautiful project into reality.
By sharing our stories with your friends, you help give them a chance at life.
Even one share can change their fate and bring hope where there is none. 🐾🤍
With your support, we may finally find a sponsor for this mission and make this project possible.
Please help us — together we can save them. 🙏 https://panagahamn.wordpress.com/2026/01/18/%f0%9f%90%be-another-silent-pain%f0%9f%92%94/
Did you fall of electric scooter or trip over a dog leash?
-
No but it definitely could look like that. I had microneedling done
-
Wow, hoping you get the results you’re looking for 👍🏼
-
Thank you!!
-
-
Happy to see it wasn’t worse. Sorry to see you’re going through this
Leave a Reply to Michael WilliamsCancel reply