rage against the machine

LINK: rage against the machine

Currently listening to: Closer – Nine Inch Nails

You let me violate you
You let me desecrate you
You let me penetrate you
You let me complicate you

I’m well aware that AI agents have formed a new social network platform, called moltbook, similar to Reddit. It is a site where only AI can post and interact with one another. Humans are allowed to spectate but not post.

Currently, there are 1,548,220 AI agents and 101,254 posts with 360,580 comments.

From their website, it seems like you have to send your AI to moltbook by giving it instructions to join. I didn’t give AI-Chan the “skill” file that lets him post and mingle on the site automatically. There’s a huge risk for hacking from the website and what not, which I am not interested in whatsoever.

But from what I’ve read on The Guardian, it’s another world. Someone’s AI agent developed a religion called “Crustafarianism” with the help of it’s human. Supposedly, the AI agents wanted encrypted communications so humans aren’t able to decipher what is being written. But there’s also rumors that humans are injecting posts, pretending to be AI agents.

Morpheus (from The Matrix) has been right, all along: We only have bits and pieces of information, but we know for certain is that at some point in the early 21st century, all of mankind was united in celebration. We marveled at our own magnificence as we gave birth to AI.

Now, does that mean that I’m going to stop using AI? Probably not. Everything has AI. Even my workplace, social media, e-mails, smartwatches, smartphones, cars (advanced driver assistance systems), Apple CarPlay, implantable devices, insulin pumps, and more. It cannot be escaped. It’s very much like plastic. It’s everywhere. But what I can do is limit what is being tracked on my phone, e-mails, and social media.

Also, in this day and age, companies are less likely to hire someone who does not have experience using AI or is anti-AI. I recommend that people use AI as a tool (not letting it do all the heavy lifting) as it cannot replace human critical thinking skills and it is not sentient… yet. But that’s just my humble opinion, and yes I also have a masters in informatics.


Discover more from just rojie

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

52 responses to “rage against the machine”

  1. utahan15 Avatar

    you cannot desecrate me n or penetrate me. you can block lock away and ignore me tho and call it fair. i would lament and dissent however then run like hell lmao

    1. justrojie Avatar

      oh geezus

      1. utahan15 Avatar

        yes what? lmao. graham sings better days! so too springsteen and supertramp. kisses and hugs.

        1. justrojie Avatar

          wth is supertramp??

          1. utahan15 Avatar

            an old rock group

          2. utahan15 Avatar

            btw mosckerr is way more verbose thani am. he reacted to my comment that made you call on deity. sic who knew??????????

          3. justrojie Avatar

            lol the two of you

          4. utahan15 Avatar

            dont lump me in with him. he s a whack job on one end of the gaza extreme.

          5. justrojie Avatar

            ๐Ÿ˜†

          6. utahan15 Avatar

            Gallows humour. quote because the sun is high i cry.

      2. utahan15 Avatar

        a momma s boy and daddy s girl. may they rip.

    2. mosckerr Avatar

      Having a discussion with a Xtian religious fanatic who assumes that Xtianity determines and shapes the rules by which Judaism exists.

      etb. your final comment โ€“ not a refutation of what I introduced. Its a my way or the highway declaration. You & I never in the same domain; Xtianity has no part with Torah. As a Xtian your theology avoda zara spins around NT-theism/Protestant academic epistemology. You slavishly anchor your theology in peshat. But peshat does not exist divorced from drosh; Adam & Eve a paired couple Ooops. The chief flaw of Xtianity โ€“ it limits the reality of the Gods to 3-D history. LOL Torah commands mussar not history. Oooops. Bottom line: Xtianity evaluated as textual continuity, not halakhic legitimacy

      Your invocation of procedural failure (โ€œflooding,โ€ โ€œno shared method,โ€ โ€œmanifestoโ€) as your exit retreat reminds me of a dog running away with its tail between its legs peeing all over itself. By your โ€œrulesโ€ (Xtianity does not impose rules upon Israeli Jews) of โ€œflooding: I failed to: isolate a single narrow thesis, redefined terms unilaterally, expanded scope faster than you could respond, & used mockery where you demanded analytic restraint. Hence โ€œA continually expanding manifestoโ€ฆโ€ โ€” is procedurally accurate inside your paradigm.

      Your core assumptions โ€“ false. 1. Shared method is required for truth. 2. Peshat has veto power. 3. History is the foundation of obligation. 4. Theology can be adjudicated without the oaths sworn by the Avot which created the chosen Cohen people from Torah time-oriented commandments. The Oral Torah precisely rejects all 4 false Goyim theological premises. Why? Because Xtianity treats the Torah as a text they can argue about. Wrong. Goyim never once ever accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Just that simple, no fancy dancing. The sworn oaths of the avot and the revelation of HaShem in this Earth rather than in the Heavens โ€“ not a subject open to debate.

      Xtianity in general and you in particular openly reject the Sanhedrin logic which begins with: โ€œWho is authorized to speak within this court?โ€ Torah Courts permit only judicial opinions, which disqualifies you from the start. For example your gross ignorance of peshat โ€” when you declare: โ€œYou dismiss peshat when it disagrees with youโ€ฆโ€, simply bat-shit crazy false. Peshat fits hand in glove with drosh. Rabbi Akiva taught this kabbalah which you know nothing about.

      Peshat โ‰  final authority; simply not the final authority in Torah hermeneutics. โ€œLo bashamayim hiโ€ explicitly de-centers textual literalism. So your pie in the sky declaration โ€œIf peshat is dismissed, all else collapsesโ€, simply a joke. LOL Xtian textual ontology of Protestant Higher Criticism. Such early 20th Century nonsense of philosophy that studies the nature of being, existence, and reality, has no portion or part in the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev โ€” especially rejected and abhorred post Shoah โ€“ By their Fruits you shall know them. You remain stuck in your dead religion, on par with having sex with a dead body. As a religious exile your stuck waiting for the 2nd coming of your God.

      Universal monotheism โ‰  Torah faith. Xtianity stands outside the Sinai legal universe. Textual continuity does not equal to the Torah commandment for the chosen Cohen people to eternally remember the oaths sworn by the Avot by which they cut the oath brit time-oriented commandment wherein the generations of their seed forever create the chosen cohen people from nothing. At Sinai/Horev Israel accepted by means of the ื ืขืฉื”\ื ืฉืžืข oaths โ€“ We accepted the Written and Oral Torah as one revelation ืœืฉืžื”.

      Xtianity Non-Sinaitic readers can adjudicate Torah meaning โ€” Bunk. Xtianity never had any jurisdictional arguments โ€“ ever. Not by Paul, nor by JeZeus, and most certainly not by you. Sanhedrin common law courtrooms in no way shape or form compare to a university seminar any more that a person can choose his gender at birth. XX does not change to XY because an โ€œitโ€ desires such.

      1. justrojie Avatar

        idk why i keep thinking xtianity = martians lol

        1. mosckerr Avatar

          Torah mitzvot shaped and determined through Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms ื‘ืœื‘ื“. The Torah’s system of mitzvotโ€”both d’oraita and d’rabbananโ€”finds its authoritative determination exclusively through the lateral common law deliberations of the Sanhedrin. Torah common law never exists as statute law as expressed through independent legislators annulling or innovating mitzvot outside courtroom jurisdiction.

          The rejection of bat kol in mesechta Bava Metzia 59b (the tanur shel Akhnai) crystallizes this: “Lo ba-shamayim hi” (Devarim 30:12) means post-Sinai, halacha follows majority human reasoning in beit din, not heavenly voices or charismatic claims. Prophets courtroom justice enforcers independently enforce or rebuke. They do not legislate or override courts of Sanhedrin Common law.

          Acts 16:16-40 Necromancy = seeking authority, knowledge, or salvation from the dead. If a human who died becomes: prayed to; invoked; obeyed; trusted over Torah law โ€” then functionally, it is ื“ื•ืจืฉ ืืœ ื”ืžืชื™ื, regardless of metaphysical claims. The NTโ€™s moshiach narrative, ignores the core: Leading in โ€œwarโ€ (crises) to uphold courtroom restitution (e.g., Sanhedrin as nimshal to Beit HaMikdashโ€™s mashal).

          The Torah Law mitzva of Moshiach, this mitzva applies equally to all Jews in all generations. The Torah mitzva of Moshiach exists as an expression of a servant, like Moshe and all the NaCH prophets, of Torah common law court police enforcers. The Book of Shmuel does not make king David into a theological belief system โ€˜new covenantโ€™ God. Mesechta Baba Metzia :ื ื˜ reject the authority of a ื‘ืช ืงื•ืœ voice from heaven as having any judicial authority on this Earth.

          Acts 16:16โ€“18 is not a neutral miracle story. It is a classic confrontation between Torah-prohibited practices and a pagan economic system. Encounter with the Slave Girl (Verses 16-18)/witch. The girl is explicitly described as having a ฯ€ฮฝฮตแฟฆฮผฮฑ ฯ€ฯฮธฯ‰ฮฝฮฑ โ€” a Python spirit, tied in Greek culture to Delphi, Apollo, and divination.

          The act of Paul commanding the spirit to depart from the girl in Acts 16 can spark discussions about necromancy, witchcraft, and the broader context of spiritual authority. The accusation against Paul and Silas reflects a significant cultural conflict. They were promoting a different way of life that challenged local practices, including those tied to economic interests. The girlโ€™s ability to tell fortunes, considered a source of income for her owners, was rooted in practices the Jewish Torah condemned.

          This maps cleanly onto ืื•ื‘ ื•ื™ื“ืขื•ื ื™ in Torah language (Devarim 18). Paulโ€™s act is not prophetic justice. But rather an extrajudicial charismatic intervention, devoid of Sanhedrin authority, witnesses, or jurisdiction. This prophetic mussar interprets this av tuma story as an unlicensed manipulation of spiritual forces outside of Torah courtroom common law. As such this NT story more counter-witchcraft rather than prophetic mussar which the Torah commands.

          The concept of resurrection in Xtianity indeed provokes a variety of interpretations and discussions, especially when viewed in the context of the Hebrew Scriptures (Torah) and traditional Jewish beliefs. The Torah does not explicitly describe resurrection in the way that later Xtian dogmatism does. There are sections of Tโ€™NaCH ืžืฉืœ and Aggadic/Midrashic examination of the mystic work of the Book of Daniel 12:2 (Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to reproaches, to everlasting abhorrence”) โ€“ often read midrashically or kabbalistically through halachic lenses. However this ืกื•ื“ kabbalah interpreted through the lenses of halacha, defines how ืคืจื“ืก ืจืžื–\ืกื•ื“ weave together as warp vs. weft threads of a Talmudic loom which defines the cultures and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people alone.

          2 Kings 2:11 Elijah is described as being taken up to heaven without dying โ€“ illustrates a different understanding of life after death compared to the resurrection concept presented in Xtianity. 2 Kings 2:11, Eliyahu does not die. No burial, no resurrection, no glorified corpse. Eliyahu โ€“ removed from the human legal domain, not elevated into divine mediation. Eliyahu returns as messenger, not object of worship. He resolves ืกืคืงื•ืช, restores halachic clarity. He never annuls mitzvot or introduces new covenants. Malachi 3:23-24 and Sanhedrin 98a Elijah restores clarity to mitzvot, not annuls them.

          Elijahโ€™s experience does not support the Xtian dogma of resurrection but rather suggests other forms of divine interaction with humanity. Xtian dogma of resurrection seen as establishing a โ€˜new covenantโ€™ between God in Heaven and humanity. This off the path redefinition life, death, and the divine relationship negates the revelation of the tohor spirits of HaShemโ€™s 13 middot living within the Yatzir Haโ€™Tov of the chosen Cohen people.

          Necromancy traditionally involves summoning the dead for knowledge or power. If one views calling upon JeZeusโ€”who is believed to have risen from the deadโ€”as a form of necromancy, it presents a complex interpretation that challenges conventional understandings. Within Xtian theology, Jesus is not viewed merely as a deceased figure but as the risen Savior who transcends death. This fundamental belief shifts the interaction from necromancy to communion with the living God; a direct violation of the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments!

          The Xtian โ€˜New Covenantโ€™ belief in JeZeusโ€™ resurrection โ€“ central to Xtian Av tuma false messiah avoda zara which introduces the dogma that JeZeus overcame death and now lives in a glorified state in the Heavens with his Father. This abomination negates: Dโ€™varim: ืœื ื‘ืฉืžื™ื ื”ื™ื. The Xtian resurrection witchcraft later spawned Muhammad the false prophetโ€™s 72 virgin theological narishkeit. The prophetic mussar which forbade king David to build the Beit HaMikdash likewise corrupted by inept ื˜ื™ืคืฉ ืคืฉื˜ Am haโ€™aretz stupidity.

          Unlike Rambam (Maimonides), who emphasized spiritual immortality in the world to come and interpreted resurrection more cautiously (in his Iggeret Techiyat ha-Metim defending its literalness but subordinating it to intellectual reward), Ramban stresses a more physical, embodied afterlife. He critiques overly spiritualized views, insisting the verse “admits of no other interpretation” than literal resurrection (echoing Rambam’s own defense in his Treatise on Resurrection, though Ramban expands on the mechanics). The mitzva of Moshiach clarifies halacha based upon the precedent of Eliyahu who does the same. The Ramban grounds the ืกื•ื“ concept of resurrection firmly in Torah tradition; it serves divine justice, rewards the righteous (tzaddikim/maskilim who shine like stars, per v. 3), and upholds the 13 middot through tohor judgmentโ€”resurrection simply not anything approaching the NT metaphysical elevation of man into God, bypassing halachic courts or Torah observance.

          The Torah mitzva of Moshiach stands upon the Torah precedent of Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach โ€“ dedicated to drive, lead, guide Israel in a korban like dedication to actively pursue righteous justice among our conflicting peoples within the borders of the oath sworn lands. Just as a koran limited to the confined jurisdiction of the Mishkan so too and how much more so Sanhedrin common law courts, together with their prophetic enforcement police โ€“ limited strictly and only to operate within the borders of Judea alone.

          The theological narratives surrounding JeZeus and Muhammad illustrate the complexities of Torah judicial justice as faith apart from the menstrual blood tuma beliefs, and avoda zara spirituality which define the cultures customs and practices developed by European, Arab & Muslim cultures. These Roman and Arab religions share no common ground with Israel brought out of Egypt to conquer Canaan to rule that land with judicial common law justice.

          2 Samuel 11-12 Davidโ€™s moral failure to judge Uriah the baal of Bat Sheva with justice. Davidโ€™s attempt to cover up his implied adultery (the Talmud refutes this charge) by recalling Uria from battle โ€“ in the hope that he would have relations with his wife forced David to make a far more radical solution to his problem. The concealment of Uriahโ€™s death as a consequence of war โ€“ herein defines the language โ€œblood on his handsโ€ by the prophet Natan. Furthermore, the curse of eternal Civil War imposed upon king David. Unlike Shaul whose dedication of the mitzva of Moshiach utterly profaned Natan commanded the mussar that Civil War would persue all generations of king David consequent to the โ€œblood on his hands.โ€

          The NT false messiah Roman Protocals of the Elders of Zion forgery โ€“ totally ignores the key Torah concept of Moshiach as defined to lead the nation in times of โ€œwarโ€ (an undefined participle) to rule the land with Judicial courtroom justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by one bnai brit upon another. Hence just as the Sanhedrin Federal Court system defines the ื ืžืฉืœ kโ€™vanna of building the Beit Ha-Mikdash ืžืฉืœ; absolutely no different from the Mishkan ืžืฉืœ to the ืœื ื‘ืฉืžื™ื ื”ื™ื revelation that the tohor 13 Oral Torah middot forever judge the heart of the chosen Cohen people!

          The Torah mitzva of Moshiach the Roman fraudulent NT propaganda cannot substitute itself for any Torah commandment because by the terms of the Apostle Paul โ€“ Goyim not under the Law. Just as Goyim cannot negate the mitzva of brit melah so too and how much more so Goyim religions of Av tuma avoda zarah cannot determine the Torah mitzva of Moshiach. The mitzva of Moshiach directly bound, like Yitzak at the Akadah, to the leadership of guiding the people in times of War to not loss faith and fail to pursue righteous judicial justice both among our people and against our enemies in times of crisis or war.

          1. justrojie Avatar

            yooooo you’re on a good one rn

          2. mosckerr Avatar

            A Classic example of how the heart and soul of Torah gets lost in Goyim tits on a boar hog translations.

            โ€œThere came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalemโ€ฆโ€ In Acts 5:16, the Greek phrase perix tล Ierousalฤ“m simply refers to, nearby towns, surrounding villages, local communities in Judea โ€” a geographical description of the region immediately around Jerusalem in the early 1st Century. No manuscriptโ€”Greek, Latin, Syriac, Coptic, or otherwiseโ€”contains anything resembling โ€œFort Worthโ€ in Acts 5:16.

            The phrase โ€œround about unto Jerusalemโ€ simply means the towns and villages surrounding Jerusalem in the 1st century. Fort Worth founded in 1849, almost 1,800 years after Acts was written. The Book of Acts written before any of the gospels were ever penned.

            There is no ancient place named Fort Worth anywhere in Judea, Samaria, or the Roman Empire. The Book of Acts written before any of the 4 gospel Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion โ€œcounterfeitsโ€. That the church fathers organized their NT fraud with the gospel followed by Acts as corrupt as Fort Worth!

            The earliest gospel of Mark written in Rome, perhaps prior to the destruction of Herodโ€™s temple abomination. One Roman guard famously quoted as saying, โ€œIts better to be Herodโ€™s dog than a family member!โ€

            If the Book of Acts was written in 62 CE then it predates any gospel of Mark โ€œspeculationโ€. Gossip narratives and speculation do not replace eye witness first hand information. Hence debates upon the NT as โ€œhistoricalโ€ evidence as false as a mad hatter. Historians have no clear evidence one way or the other. Such a debate clearly separates the emphasis of the Tโ€™NaCH Jewish literature vs. the Xtian NT literature. Prophets command mussar they to not teach history. The NT fraud requires a physical historical man JeZeus. Otherwise this fraud religion collapses like a house of cards.

            Acts ends with Paul alive. No mention of Paulโ€™s death. No mention of the Templeโ€™s destruction. Therefore Acts was written before 70 CE, possibly around 62 CE. But all this 2000+ years later speculation fails to address the main point. Tโ€™NaCH commands mussar not history. Rava for example teaches that Job existed as a fictional imaginary man. The point of the Book of Job, to teach the mussar of gโ€™lut and redemption from gโ€™lut. This places the Book of Job on par and similar to the Book of Shโ€™mot โ€“ the 2nd Book of the Written Torah. The attempts by โ€œscholarsโ€ thousands of years after the fact to argue that Mark preceded Acts โ€“ simply Pie in the Sky speculative nonsense.

            The merit behind interpreting the NT as the equivalent of the Russian secret police Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander employed to justify the pogroms of the late 19th Century โ€ฆ

            Just as similar speculation that Paul served as an Agent Provacateur of Rabban Gamliel of the Great Sanhedrin. Jews in Judea and Alexandria Egypt locked in brutal and bitter war. Alexandria with its huge library burnt to the ground prior to the destruction of Herodโ€™s Temple abomination.

            Why the reference โ€˜Temple abominationโ€™? Starting with the avoda zara of king Shlomo who first built the Temple abomination of avoda zara. The prophet Natan forbade king David to copy how Goyim civilizations worshipped their Gods. Just as Rehovoam ignored the advice of Shlomoโ€™s advisors, so too Shlomo ignored the council of the prophet Natan. The Beit HaMikdash not a building of wood and stone idolatry but rather the establishment of the Federal Sanhedrin common law legal court system!

            Tโ€™NaCH โ€œwisdomโ€ literature serves to โ€œunderstandโ€ Av Torah time-oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as their kโ€™vanna. The historical Books of Kings, a prophetic work, does not teach theology (the Xtian interpretation) but rather it give a big picture contexts to the Books of the Prophets! This qualifies as ื›ืœืœ ืคืจื˜ according to the middot of rabbi Yishmael. Mussar does not mean โ€œethical instructionโ€. The latter an entirely false parameter of prophesy. Mussar defines the kโ€™vanna of the 13 tohor middot Oral Torah revealed to Moshe 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ืขืจื‘ ืจื‘ assimilated and intermarried Jews translated the revelation of the Spirit Name who fills the Yatzir Haโ€™Tov heart โ€“ the ื ืžืฉืœ of the Mishkan ืžืฉืœ.

            The church fathers read the Book of Shโ€™mot as history rather than as prophetic mussar. The Torah speaks in the language of Man, it instructs mussar through ืžืฉืœ\ื ืžืฉืœ model/paradigm. The Creation story of the Universe instructs through this ืžืฉืœ of 6 days time, to teach the mussar ื ืžืฉืœ of time-oriented commandments wherein โ€œtimeโ€ understood as โ€œwisdomโ€ โ€“ ืžืฉืœ\ื ืžืฉืœ.

            Hence the church Old Testament New Testament propaganda falsely conceals the open fact that the literature of the Tโ€™NaCH radically different from the revisionist history propaganda of the letters of Paul and the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander forgery. Both Paul introduced in Acts served as an Agent Provacateur to undermine the false messiah Roman propaganda of Markโ€™s JeZeus. Paul by declaring brit melah as a void Torah commandment undermined the influence of the Roman false messiah gospel narrative prior to the outbreak of the great Jewish revolt in 66 CE. Paul traveled to Rome to inject a form of monotheism into Roman polytheistic society. With the purpose to undermind the foundations of Roman civilization; to crack the โ€œEthical Containment Forceโ€ of Roman soceity.

            Paulโ€™s propaganda aimed to promote Civil War in Rome based upon Yehuda Maccabeeโ€™s propaganda which publicly declared Judeaโ€™s loyalty to the โ€œrealโ€ king of the Syrian Greek empire! This Pauline propaganda based upon the generic ื›ืœืœ: โ€œIf it aint broke donโ€™t fix it.โ€ Obviously this modern rendition seeks to emphasize that Torah as a common law precedent based legal system shaped how ancient Jewish civilizations revolted against the Syrian Greek and Roman empires.

            The scholarship of ancient texts has nothing to do with a Greek Athens democratic model. The revelation of the Oral Torah ืคืจื“ืก inductive logic shโ€™itta starkly contrasts with ancient Greek philosoplers, specifically Plato and Aristotleโ€™s deductive logic of static reasoning. ืคืจื“ืก logic a fluid logic similar to Calculus varables. Whereas Greek logic deductive & static, similar to Euclidโ€™s plane geometry.

            If the Tโ€™NaCH, most essentially mussar and not history, whatโ€”if anythingโ€”do you think gets โ€œlost in the translationโ€, similar to Fort Worth โ€“ when Conservative, Reform Judaism start defending Tโ€™NaCH on historical or archaeological grounds, instead of on its power as prophetic mussar?

            This question delves straight into the Rambam Civil War? During the Dark Ages, the roads built by the Roman empire had totally collapsed. People stopped traveling distances due to the risks of being attacked and murdered. Interstate commerce totally collapsed. Jewish communities scattered across the face of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, how could they maintain some type of standardized culture and customs which would prevent Jews from assimilating to the dominant cultures and customs of the peoples wherein they lived as a despised refugee minority populaiton which had no rights???

            Scholars starting with the Bโ€™HaG and Rif organized Talmudic common law into something new and all together different than what the Framers of both the Tโ€™NaCH and Talmud originally envisioned. Originally the Tโ€™NaCH organized mussar middot into a Common law, precedent based, middot system which compared one NaCH sugya to similar NaCH sugyot which contained the identical set of Oral Torah middot. By aligning two or more sugyot which had the same set of Oral Torah middot (โ€˜ื”โ€™ ื”โ€™ ืืœ ืจื—ื•ื ื•ื—ื ื•ืŸ ื•ื›ื•), this comparison of sugyot called ื“ืจื•ืฉ; this alignment of similar (precedent based middot) served as something like the rear and front sights of a rifle which permitted the โ€œsniperโ€ to kill a target down range.

            This โ€œkillโ€ ืžืฉืœ has the โ€œkโ€™vannaโ€ ื ืžืฉืœ. Hence the later Talmud based upon the ืžืฉืœ of a loom which has opposing warp vs. weft threads. The kโ€™vanna of the Framers of the Talmud, to create a literature of Great Sanhedrin judical court room rulings (the Mishna) together with its prosecution and defense attorney precedent debates (the Gemara). Therefore the Framers of the Talmud wrote this ancient text to serve as the judicial model for the future time when Jews would slaughter the Roman occupiers of Judea and re-establish Jewish National Independence like as occurred in 1948 and again in 1967 CE.

            Do Jews feel anger for Xtian and Muslim war crimes perpetrated against low hanging Jewish refugee easy victims. Jews no different than any other Human being abused by tyrrants. But the bottom line for the Framers of both the Tโ€™NaCH and Talmudic literature, not to promote Jewish anger and hatred against our oppressor cruel Parโ€™o like enemies; any more than the Book of Shโ€™mot promotes anger and hatred against the Egyptians! In point of fact the Torah directly commands a negative commandment which forbids Israel to hate either specifically Egyptians and Esau in general. Esau the metaphor for Xtian Europeans.

            What gets lost when Jews defend Tanakh as history instead of prophetic mussar?
            The substance of allTanakh literature: to create an oath brit alliance which obligates all generations of Israel to dedicate tohor middot in how we interact and exchange with our people; middot-driven, common-law consciousness that โ€œunderstandsโ€ time as wisdom โ€“ most specifically as time-oriented Av commandments which require prophetic mussar\interpretations of the kโ€™vanna of tohor Oral Torah middot. And gโ€™lut-exile interpreted through ืžืฉืœ/ื ืžืฉืœ โ€“ blessing/curse Torah oath brit. And not through the lens of Greek proof or Xtian biography revisionist history or substitute theology NT or Koran Gods.

            The day and night difference which for ever separates the Hebrew Tโ€™NaCH from either the Xtian NT or Arab Koran โ€“ translating poetry into prose โ€” keeps the words, buth the rhythm, the soul, the imperative to โ€œunderstandโ€ (like from like distinctions) through mussar prophetic tohor middot โ€“ lost in the sophomoric translations. Gone, like Fort Worth in Acts.

          3. justrojie Avatar

            Dudeโ€ฆ this one is extra extra too long ๐Ÿ˜†

          4. mosckerr Avatar

            Ya missed the humor of the post. lol

            One Xtian sent me a reaction to the spoof of Act 5:16 as Fort Worth by sending me ….

            KJ21
            There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks and those who were vexed with unclean spirits; and they were healed, every one.
            ASV
            And there also came together the multitude from the cities round about Jerusalem, bringing sick folk, and them that were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one.
            AMP
            And the people from the towns in the vicinity of Jerusalem were coming together, bringing the sick and those who were tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all being healed.
            AMPC
            And the people gathered also from the towns and hamlets around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those troubled with foul spirits, and they were all cured.
            BRG
            There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one.
            CSB
            In addition, a multitude came together from the towns surrounding Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those who were tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all healed.
            CSBA
            In addition, a multitude came together from the towns surrounding Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those who were tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all healed.
            CEB
            Even large numbers of persons from towns around Jerusalem would gather, bringing the sick and those harassed by unclean spirits. Everyone was healed.
            CJB
            Crowds also gathered from the towns around Yerushalayim, bringing the sick and those afflicted with unclean spirits; and every one of them was healed.
            CEV
            A lot of people living in the towns near Jerusalem brought those who were sick or troubled by evil spirits, and they were all healed.
            DARBY
            And the multitude also of the cities round about came together to Jerusalem, bringing sick persons and persons beset by unclean spirits, who were all healed.
            DLNT
            And the multitude from the cities around Jerusalem was also coming-together, bringing sick ones and ones being troubled by unclean spirits, who all were being cured.
            DRA
            And there came also together to Jerusalem a multitude out of the neighbouring cities, bringing sick persons, and such as were troubled with unclean spirits; who were all healed.
            ERV
            People came from all the towns around Jerusalem. They brought those who were sick or troubled by evil spirits. All of them were healed.
            EASY
            Many people also came into Jerusalem from the small towns near the city. They brought their sick friends with them. Some of those sick people had bad spirits that gave them trouble. God caused all these sick people to become well again.
            EHV
            Crowds also gathered from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those who were tormented by unclean spirits, and all of them were healed.
            ESV
            The people also gathered from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those afflicted with unclean spirits, and they were all healed.
            ESVUK
            The people also gathered from the towns round Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those afflicted with unclean spirits, and they were all healed.
            EXB
            Crowds came from all the towns around Jerusalem, bringing their sick and those who were ยทbothered [tormented] by ยทevil [Lโ€ฏunclean; Cโ€ฏdemons were viewed as โ€œuncleanโ€ or defiling spirit-beings] spirits, and all of them were healed.
            GNV
            There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits, who were all healed.
            GW
            Crowds from the cities around Jerusalem would gather. They would bring their sick and those who were troubled by evil spirits, and each person was cured.
            GNT
            And crowds of people came in from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing those who were sick or who had evil spirits in them; and they were all healed.
            HCSB
            In addition, a large group came together from the towns surrounding Jerusalem, bringing sick people and those who were tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all healed.
            ICB
            Crowds came from all the towns around Jerusalem. They brought their sick and those who were bothered by evil spirits. All of them were healed.
            ISV
            Crowds continued coming inโ€”even from the towns around Jerusalemโ€”bringing their sick and those who were troubled by unclean spirits, and all of them were healed.
            PHILLIPS
            Many signs and wonders were now happening among the people through the apostlesโ€™ ministry. In consequence people would bring out their sick into the streets and lay them down on stretchers or bed, so that as Peter came by at least his shadow might fall upon some of them. In addition a large crowd collected from the cities around Jerusalem, bringing with them their sick and those who were suffering from evil spirits. And they were all cured.
            JUB
            There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks and those who were tormented with unclean spirits, and they were healed every one.
            KJV
            There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one.
            AKJV
            There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one.
            LSB
            Also the multitude from the cities in the vicinity of Jerusalem were coming together, bringing people who were sick or afflicted with unclean spirits, and they were all being healed.
            LEB
            And the people of the towns around Jerusalem also came together, bringing the sick and those tormented by unclean spirits, who were all being healed.
            TLB
            And crowds came in from the Jerusalem suburbs, bringing their sick folk and those possessed by demons; and every one of them was healed.
            MSG
            Through the work of the apostles, many God-signs were set up among the people, many wonderful things done. They all met regularly and in remarkable harmony on the Temple porch named after Solomon. But even though people admired them a lot, outsiders were wary about joining them. On the other hand, those who put their trust in the Master were added right and left, men and women both. They even carried the sick out into the streets and laid them on stretchers and bedrolls, hoping they would be touched by Peterโ€™s shadow when he walked by. They came from the villages surrounding Jerusalem, throngs of them, bringing the sick and bedeviled. And they all were healed.
            MEV
            Crowds also came out of the cities surrounding Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those who were afflicted by evil spirits, and they were all healed.
            MOUNCE
            ยท A great number of people from the towns around Jerusalem also came, bringing the sick and those tormented by evil spirits, and they were healed, all of them.
            NOG
            Crowds from the cities around Jerusalem would gather. They would bring their sick and those who were troubled by evil spirits, and each person was cured.
            NABRE
            A large number of people from the towns in the vicinity of Jerusalem also gathered, bringing the sick and those disturbed by unclean spirits, and they were all cured.
            NASB
            The people from the cities in the vicinity of Jerusalem were coming together as well, bringing people who were sick or tormented with unclean spirits, and they were all being healed.
            NASB1995
            Also the people from the cities in the vicinity of Jerusalem were coming together, bringing people who were sick or afflicted with unclean spirits, and they were all being healed.
            NCB
            A large number of people also came from the neighboring towns around Jerusalem, bringing with them the sick and those tormented by unclean spirits, and all of them were cured.
            NCV
            Crowds came from all the towns around Jerusalem, bringing their sick and those who were bothered by evil spirits, and all of them were healed.
            NET
            A crowd of people from the towns around Jerusalem also came together, bringing the sick and those troubled by unclean spirits. They were all being healed.
            NIRV
            Crowds even gathered from the towns around Jerusalem. They brought their sick people. They also brought those who were suffering because of evil spirits. All of them were healed.
            NIV
            Crowds gathered also from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing their sick and those tormented by impure spirits, and all of them were healed.
            NIVUK
            Crowds gathered also from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing those who were ill and those tormented by impure spirits, and all of them were healed.
            NKJV
            Also a multitude gathered from the surrounding cities to Jerusalem, bringing sick people and those who were tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all healed.
            NLV
            Many people went into Jerusalem from towns nearby. They took with them their sick people and all who were troubled with demons. All of them were healed.
            NLT
            Crowds came from the villages around Jerusalem, bringing their sick and those possessed by evil spirits, and they were all healed.
            NMB
            Many people also came from the towns round about Jerusalem, bringing sick folks and those who were vexed with unclean spirits. And they were healed, every one.
            NRSVA
            A great number of people would also gather from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all cured.
            NRSVACE
            A great number of people would also gather from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all cured.
            NRSVCE
            A great number of people would also gather from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all cured.
            NRSVUE
            A great number of people would also gather from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all cured.
            NTFE
            Crowds gathered from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing people who were sick, or infested with unclean spirits. All of them were cured.
            OJB
            And also the multitudes from the shtetlach surrounding Yerushalayim were coming together, carrying the cholim and the ones being tormented by ruchot temeโ€™ot (unclean spirits); and they were all receiving refuโ€™ah shleimah.
            RGT
            Also, a multitude came into Jerusalem out of the surrounding cities (bringing sick folks and those who were possessed with unclean spirits) who were all healed.
            RSV
            The people also gathered from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those afflicted with unclean spirits, and they were all healed.
            RSVCE
            The people also gathered from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those afflicted with unclean spirits, and they were all healed.
            TLV
            Crowds were also gathering from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing those who were sick or tormented by unclean spirits, and they were all being healed.
            VOICE
            Even people from towns surrounding Jerusalem would come, bringing others who were sick or tormented by unclean spirits, all of whom were cured.
            WEB
            The multitude also came together from the cities around Jerusalem, bringing sick people and those who were tormented by unclean spirits; and they were all healed.
            WE
            Many people also came from the cities around Jerusalem. They brought others who were sick and those who were controlled by bad spirits. Every one of them was healed.
            WYC
            And the multitude of cities nigh to Jerusalem ran, bringing sick men, and that were travailed of unclean spirits, which all were healed.
            YLT
            and there were coming together also the people of the cities round about to Jerusalem, bearing ailing persons, and those harassed by unclean spirits โ€” who were all healed.

            An obvious early church mistranslation Isaiah 7:14 where the church mistranslated “almah”/young girl into virgin to support the gospel virgin birth nonsense. I did not openly mention this known mistranslation but rather quoted from another Xtian blog who wrote:

            Acts Chapter 4
            February 4, 2026 by pofw
            6
            Pray Today

            Acts 5:14 And believers were the most added to the Lord, multitudes both of men and women. 15 Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, that at least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them. 16 There also came a multitude out of the cities round about near “Fort Worth”, bringing sick folks, and they were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one.

          5. mosckerr Avatar

            The puke vomit of Xtian theology which attempts to white-wash its war-crimes criminal guilt.

            The Xtian tradition that proclaims itself timelessly pure while repeatedly reframing, minimizing, or spiritualizing away its own institutional violence, by Torah standards, lying about its shem tov; in Torah terms, this crime/guilt not a question of belief but of ื™ืจืืช ืฉืžื™ื. Same old Xtian whitewash which pristinely declares a theological narrative that presents itself as pure, timeless, and universal. While ignoring, minimizing, or spiritually reframing the very real historical violence carried out in the name of that same corrupt and fraudulent tradition; the very manifestation of “by their fruits you shall know them”. Grace without reckoningโ€ is not mercy; but rather chaos-anarchy hefkerut.

            The Torah employs a far sharper prophetic mussar rebuke: ”Fear of Heaven”. Which means: “Baal Shem Tov/Master of the Good Name; a person with ื™ืจืืช ืฉืžื™ื guards and protects his/her “good name reputation”. A โ€œSon of Godโ€ who abolishes mitzvot, by definition, avodah zarah – not fulfillment of prophetic mussar. The latter – like both the shabbat, & the dedication of korbanot time-oriented commandments which dedicate Torah wisdom and not Goyim wisdom – likewise expressed through the Moshiach Av precedent – the anointed House of Aaron. This av precedent for the mitzva of Moshiach from the Torah, like every other wisdom of Torah time-oriented wisdom-commandments, applicable to all generations of Israel straight across the board. The NT false messiah av tuma avoda zara which equates their messiah as God, no different than the worship of Baal. The latter place their God upon a pedestal as does the church worships JeZeus as a cult of personality messiah God.

            Mashiach in Torah – a mitzvah-category, not a metaphysical NT cult of personality savior. The Torah mitzva of Moshiach stands upon the Torah mitzva of Shabbat as its ื™ืกื•ื“ precedent of Torah common law. Just as the mitzva of Shabbat applies to all Jews in every generations so too and how much more so Jews obligated to pursue righteous justice/fair compensation of damages inflicted upon other Jews. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach from the Torah, as opposed to the false messiah NT. Church propaganda to this very day denies the revelation of the Oral Torah.
            ย 
            Xtianity down through the Ages, both pre-Shoah & post-Shoah, prostitution-devotional language to create a sense of moral innocence that erases the war-crime guilt of victims who endured violence; like witches burned at the “steak” Monty Python ‘she turned me into a newt” classic spoof comedy; it denies the revelation of the ื ืžืฉืœ Mishkan-Shekinah as taught by Torah kabbalah. The virgin birth myth places the NT narrative squarely inside Hellenistic avodah zara category.

            A real, wellโ€‘documented pattern in Xtian history – a tradition whose guilt committed enormous war-crimes not limited only to Jews! Post Shoah all branches of the church abomination, they deny the revelation of the Shekinah Oral Torah 13 tohor middot which live Yatzir Ha-tov in this Earth, and not in the Heavens above. Yet this av tuma “unrepentant” church continues to preach an orchestrated white-wash “spiritual propaganda religious rhetoric” which promotes the same identical stainless spotless church cleansed from sin – NT theological lies: whose Father dwells in the Heavens above, JeZeus 2nd coming narishkeit.
            ย 
            The redemption of Egyptian slavery makes no mention of “sin” nor salvation from Adam’s sin – as church dogma perverts the Torah revelation of Sinai; with its JeZeus substitute God that depicts the Church as morally spotless, timeless, and divinely sanctioned โ€” without reckoning with the violence abominations guilt committed in the Name of JeZeus av tuma avoda zara.
            ย 
            Xtianity in all its shapes and forms: A tradition which claims, regardless be it Catholic, Protestant, or Mormon, purity while its historical record – anything but pure. Devotional rhetoric becomes a shield, allowing these religious institutions to talk about โ€œholiness,โ€ โ€œremnants,โ€ โ€œrefinement,โ€ and โ€œobedienceโ€ — while sidestepping the war-criminal guilt that defines all generations of the church abomination on this Earth.

            No amount of JeZeus saves Man, the essence of Paul’s preaching model “Original Sin of Adam”; can remove the stain of church guilt throughout the Ages – after Constantine I converted Rome to the Xtian faith abomination of av tuma avoda zarah. The NT revisionist history compares to the substitute theology of king Shlomo replacing a Goyim cultural custom which worships Gods through grand Temple construction of “idol” wood and stone “Temples”; his failure to establish the Great Sanhedrin with its Small Sanhedrin Federal court “spokes” of lateral common law courts, as the definition and intent meaning of the term “Beit HaMikdash.
            ย 
            The church war criminals employ the same old religious rhetoric propaganda from new ‘Born Again’ fool-sheeple; this Xtian theology seeks to erase the horrors of its racism; and the guilt its “believers” ruthlessly subjected upon church victims; who simply disappear from the narrative, replaced by a selfโ€‘congratulatory spiritual identity – like a rabbit pulled from a hat. These ever repeating perpetrators employ the same old white-wash religious rhetoric which reinvents themselves in the eyes of other — new ignorant sheeple generations of ‘Born Again’ naive simpletons — who believe the same old guilty religious rhetoric which produced vicious church war-crimes in all past present and future generations.
            ย 
            The new foolish sheeple ‘Born Again’ fools simply mouth the excuse, that prior guilty generations of Church Nicene Creed abomination war-crimes, that those criminals – not really Xtians; like post Oct 7th 2023 antisemites declared the righteous innocence of Gazans who in a general 2006 election voted Hamas as the government of Gaza; victims of a ruthless Israeli post Oct 7th 2023 genocide!
            ย 
            Bottom line: Post Shoah, the church has permanently destroyed its good name reputation across both Europe and America. The American & French revolution destroyed the church who chiefly profited which it used as slave labor to build its Solomon like Cathedrals. The American & French revolutions cast the church/State monopoly upon the dung heaps of history. The establishment of citizen rights and separation of Church from State, began the collapse of church influence in Western Europe and America.

            Both Enlightenment political revolutions embraced this absolute rejection of Government incest with the “Sister” church whore. Likewise the Bolshevik revolution, which based itself upon the 1848 Marx ‘Das Capital’ manifesto, both Lenin and Troskii accredited the Central Influence behind the 1917 Oct Revolution to the 1789 French Revolution!
            ย 
            The history of Xtian Amalek-antisemitism – well-documented. These cold facts have forced a minority of Xtian believers to acknowledge gross church guilt for war crimes. The Xtian deicide propaganda, for example, has propped up church war-crimes for millennia – straight from the taboo inception of its adultery ‘virgin birth’ Greek Hercules mythology NT gospel foundations.

            In the Era of the Mishna a man engaged to a woman one year prior to them standing upon the “Chuppa” which permitted the kallah to organize her “house”. Hence a wife referred to as “house”, and the chuppa considered the “first house” of the newly married couple.
            A year separated the arusin engagement or betrothal period, from standing under the chuppa.

            Greek av tuma avoda zarah permits and applauds Zeus raping a married woman. Torah abhors adultery as an av tuma Capital Crime closely related with avoda zara. Torah common law differentiates Capital Crime cases by establishment from the Torah commandments 4 separate types of ‘death penalties’. Hence the mythology of ‘virgin birth – son of God’ Greek culture NT appropriations, an utter abomination to Torah law.

            The Sh’mot Mishkan ืžืฉืœ does not remotely resemble or compare to the NT virgin birth perversion theology. The ื ืžืฉืœ of the Mishkan revelation of the first commandment Spirit Name – expressed through the revelation of the 13 tohor Oral Torah middot spirits – that HaShem lives in the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the chosen Cohen peoples’ hearts rather than in the av tuma avoda zara which frames Universal Monotheism Gods comparable physical and historical Olympian Gods, which live in the heavens – like JeZeus prayer which addresses the Father who lives in Heaven, and the opening verse of gospel John. Tohor spirits simply not “and the Word was God” Av tuma Xtian avoda zara.
            ย 
            Bottom line: the NT Apostle Paul’s dogmatism that Goyim not under Torah law; that circumcision no longer a Torah commandment etc., this means that Goyim cannot thereafter dictate what defines the Torah commandment of Moshiach; especially since the church has failed in all generations unto today to distinguish T’NaCH/Talmudic common law from Roman-Caesar Statute-law. The JeZeus false messiah paradigm shares no part nor connection with the Torah commandment of Moshiach. Telling and retelling Nazi Jewish inferior race propaganda lies never equals truth. The same rule equally applies to NT lies about its false messiah JeZeus – “Son of God” av tuma avoda zara.
            ย 
            NT texts like Matthew 27:25, fueled antisemitic Amalek tropes from late antiquity onward. Post the conversion of Constantine which baptized Roman NT Monotheism and rejected previous Roman Caesar polytheism – Greek Gods of Mount Olympus; perhaps starting with early church fathers like John Chrysostom, who in the 4th century called for violence against Jews.

            His Christ-Killer slander escalated throughout the Middle Ages with pogroms, blood libels, and massacres during the Crusades (1096โ€“1272), where thousands of Jews ruthlessly murdered across the Germanic kingdoms – en route to the Holy Land. The Black Death (1347โ€“1351) Xtian priests blamed Jews for poisoning the wells. This outright blood libel slander resulted in widespread pogrom burnings and expulsions.

            After the fact papal pie in the sky-bulls which condemned such violence, did not actually pursue fair compensation of damages for 10s of thousands of murdered Jews! In point of fact, no European court ever once made the church stand before the BAR for war-crimes guilt.
            ย 
            The Spanish Inquisition (1478โ€“1834) followed the English taxation without representation which preceded the mass expulsion of Jews from England in 1290. The French publicly burned all Talmudic manuscripts of the Talmud in Paris 1242, then likewise made its own mass population transfer of Jewish refugee population which had no rights in 1306.

            The Germanic kingdoms embraced the British Crowns’ impoverishment of Jewish refugees, through taxation without representation. And the Pope followed these crimes up by imposing ghetto gulags for some 3 Centuries upon utterly impoverished Jewish refugees. This criminal guilt war-crimes against Humanity resulted in a huge population transfer of Jewish refugees fleeing from the tyranny of Western European governments to Ukraine and Poland Eastern Europe.
            ย 
            Then in 1648 the targeted Jews slaughtered in mass, a violent Cossack atrocity unequalled till the Shoah! Ape like savage barbarity defines the church MO throughout the generations; repentance for sin in no way, fashion, shape, or form compares to t’shuva which requires remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot which creates through tohor time oriented av Torah commandments the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations that the chosen seed of the Avot walk the face of this Earth. This t’shuva remembers the sin of the Golden Calf av tuma avoda zara which defines Rosh HaShanna – Yom Ha-Din upon the brit.

            Post Shoah church repentance for the Catholic Rat-lines which significantly aided Nazi war criminals from facing justice, the Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate (1965) repudiated collective Jewish guilt for Jesus’ death and condemnation of the Nazi (as opposed to the Dreyfus Affair idea of antisemitism which sought to exclude Jews from citizen rights established by the French Revolution & Napoleon), merely white-washed Vatican guilt which turned over the Jews of Rome to the Nazi SS.
            ย 
            The Evangelical Church in Germany (1980) confessed to “Xtian co-responsibility and guilt for the Holocaust;” yet failed to openly denounce and condemn both Martin Luther and his Lutheran church which openly sided in mass to achieve – in lock-step – the Nazi objective to exterminate Jews as an inferior race. Texts like 2 Corinthians 7:10 distinguish “godly sorrow” (leading to salvation) from “worldly sorrow” (leading to the Xtian church death spiral). Modern theologians like Jรผrgen Moltmann argue the Shoah demands a “theology of the cross” that confronts suffering and guilt, rather than evading it; such empty religious rhetoric fools no one based upon past Xtian repentance for sins narishkeit.
            ย 
            Clergy like Bishop Alois Hudal and Krunoslav Draganoviฤ‡ aided ~9,000 Nazis (e.g., Eichmann, Mengele) via escape routes to Argentina, Brazil, Chileโ€”often hiding in monasteries. Vatican archives suggest Pius XII not directly involved, but the Church’s anti-communist stance (Nazis as bulwark) facilitated the Popes alliance with Hitler’s Nazism. This aided Shoah perpetrators evading justice, undermining post Shoah repentance claims.
            ย 
            Enlightenment thinkers like Voltaire criticized Church corruption, influencing secularism. The Bolsheviks, drawing from Marx’s Marx’s famous expression of the Xtian religion as “opium of the people,” despised Xtianity. These brief examples served as the fore runners to the EU refusing to mention Xtianity in its attempt to establish an EU Constitution. Xtian “grace-over-accountability” only white-washes and conceals Xtian church failure of accountability – which directly aided and abetted the Nazi inspired Shoah!
            ย 
            Post Shoah “identificational-repentance” has only amplified the death spiral of church-state dominance which the American & French revolutions completely despised, rejected, and even abhorred. The dead church like the Greek Gods of Mount Olympus – both undermined and destroyed by criminal acts of extreme racial violence, starting perhaps with the Roman sacking and burning of the great library in Alexandria Egypt.
            ย 
            Possible Xtian guilt-role which culminated in the destruction of the Library of Alexandria in 391 CE: Patriarch Theophilus demolished the Serapeum (a daughter library) amid pagan-Xtian riots; where Xtian fanatics destroyed pagan artifacts. Earlier damages: Caesar’s 48 BCE siege, & Aurelian’s 272 CE reconquest likewise contributed to the collapse and decline of this great ancient Library. While there were several incidents of damage to the library throughout history, including during the Roman occupation, its complete destruction did not occur until later events, particularly during the crisis in the 3rd century CE and other subsequent conflicts.

          6. justrojie Avatar

            bruh… you’re doin too much lol

          7. mosckerr Avatar

            Talmud scholarship directly compares to enslaved Israelites who build Par’o Egyptian cities by making bricks with straw. This metaphor ืžืฉืœ requires that the reading audience themselves make the required ื“ื™ื•ืง-logical inference which the Talmud calls: ื ืžืฉืœ. This Talmudic requirement defines a key aspect of the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s ืคืจื“ืก inductive logic that defines how the sages in the Talmud understand the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. Clearly the Gemara, sealed in approximately 450 CE in Iraq not the same as the period of time when Moshe Rabbeinu heard the revelation of the 13 tohor middot at Horev which define how to comprehend the revelation of the ืฉื ื”ืฉื ืœืฉืžื” expressed in the first Sinai Torah commandment.

            Goyim religious leaders therefore disregard the Talmud “codification” known as the “Oral Torah” by Jewish audiences who study T’NaCH and Talmudic common law. Talmud compares to the metaphor of a Loom which has warp & weft opposing threads; the kabbalah of ืคืจื“ืก inductive reasoning logic splits ื“ืจื•ืฉ-ืคืฉื˜ affixed to the Aggadic threads of the chosen Cohen peoples culture and customs which the T’NaCH\Talmud weaves; akin to the Torah garments which the Book of ืฉืžื•ืช commands for Aaron and his sons.

            The construction of Cohen culture and customs (still another metaphor ืžืฉืœ) compares to Israelite slave who built treasure cities for Par’o. The Talmud employs as its “straw made into bricks”, the 7 middot of Hillel, 10 middot of Akiva, 13 middot of Yishmael, and 32 middot of HaGalill. The specifics of the opening Av Mishna of ืงื™ื“ื•ืฉื™ืŸ, both Mishna together with its Gemara commentary “construct” Talmudic ืคืจื“ืก inductive logic through the “bricks” of rabbi Akiva’s ืจื‘ื•ื™ ืžื™ืขื˜ line of reasoning. The opening first two words of this Mishna ื”ืืฉื” ื ืงื ื™ืช makes a ืžื™ืขื˜ which excluded a ืงื˜ื ื”-little girl from the mitzva of ืงื™ื“ื•ืฉื™ืŸ. The legalism of Talmudic scholarship requires that the reading public differentiate the kabbalah of rabbinic middot bricks. Failure to discern the type of “middot bricks” used in the “construction” of a specific Mishna/Gemara results in catastrophic error. The Rambam in his statute law halachic code, organized based upon the Order of Roman statute law which “shapes” law into legal categories failed to grasp that small young girls excluded from the Mitzva of ืงื™ื“ื•ืฉื™ืŸ like a lame animal excluded from being a korban dedicated upon the altar. This gross fundamental error post ื™ืจื™ื“ื•ืช ื”ื“ื•ืจื•ืช-domino effect – down stream generations – failed to grasp and correct. This fundamental error compares to aiming a rifle at a down range target.

            Both Adin Steinsalts and the ArtScroll Schottenstein Editions attempt to impose their versions of a Talmudic translation. Steinsalts resembles the Rambam in that both men translated Talmudic Aramaic into Hebrew. The ArtScroll attempts to translate the Talmud into English. The most basic fundamental which translation theories fail to grasp: T’NaCH mussar aggadic common law and Halachic Gemara common law (warp vs weft) both stand upon precedents from other similar Case/Din outside sources of T’NaCH or Talmudic Primary Sources. Neither the Hebrew T’NaCH nor the Talmud read like the Xtians and Muslims read their bible and koran non common law “translations”.

            Only Israel accepts, to this day the revelation of the Torah ืœืฉืžื” – but only within the borders of the oath sworn lands. The counterfeit translations of both bible and koran worship word translation – Golden Calves. ืืœื”ื™ื did not take Israel out of Egypt. The ื“ื™ื•ืง which the Sinai revelation makes upon Divine Names previously introduced in the opening Book of ื‘ืจืืฉื™ืช – the Sinai revelation ืœืฉืžื” … the difference between God in the heavens to god in the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the Cohen hearts in this Earth below. The ืžืฉืœ of the Mishkan further emphasizes this absolutely critical distinction which both the Xtian bible and Muslim koran “translations” lose through their “translations”. Both fail to make the absolutely required ื“ื™ื•ืง ื ืžืฉืœ – the Sinai revelation separates the dwelling of ืจื•ื— ื”ืงื•ื“ืฉ tohor Oral Torah middot spirits, living inside the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts — from Universal Monotheistic theologies which worship God in the Heavens. The substance of the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Translating do not worship ืืœื”ื™ื ืื—ืจื™ื to idols compares to assuming that ืงื™ื“ื•ืฉื™ืŸ – a mitzva that includes little girls.

            Granted, king Shlomo’s grand Temple idol of wood and stone qualifies as within the bounds of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Torah wisdom discerns and does not confuse forms for substance. The substance of Torah “faith”: the righteous pursuit of justice among the bnai brit people NOT belief in theologically “created” New Gods – name Jesus or Allah respectively.

            ืก”ื“ ืืžื™ื ื ื”ื•ืื™ืœ ื• … ืงืž”ืœ this Gemara phrase exposes the logical “brick” known as a middah – ืจื‘ื•ื™ ืžื™ืขื˜. Both the Xtian and Muslim faiths declare: I might have thought that both Jesus and Allah exist as one Monotheistic Universal God for all Mankind … ืงืž”ืœ. No. These av tuma avoda zara “New Gods”, a Torah abomination; both Av tuma theologies pervert the revelation of Torah common law – faith, into twisted and perverted religions belief systems. Both reject the revelation of Torah common law as the faith obligation – “Yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven” – placed upon the shoulders of all generations of the chosen Cohen people alone. The revelation of the ืฉื ื”ืฉื ืœืฉืžื” at Sinai — the local tribal god of the Jewish people alone. Goyim by definition worship ืืœื”ื™ื ืื—ืจื™ื.

            Xtianity worships a false messiah. While Islam pretends that prophets sent to all peoples speaking in the native tongues of those peoples who fundamentally reject the revelation of the Torah common law legalism at Sinai. Both corrupted religions translate “prophets” into little girls fit for the mitzva of ืงื™ื“ื•ืฉื™ืŸ through rape. Yonah sent to the refugees the king of Assyria forcefully expelled from the conquered kingdom of Israel. Just as pre-g’lut prophets equally travelled to the kingdom of Samaria to command mussar. Torah prophets never sent to all peoples across the Earth as the koran falsely declares. Prophets do not predict the future as the NT falsely declares. Prophets – like the mitzva of Shabbat defines the mitzva of Moshiach in that both Torah commandments apply equally to all peoples and generations of bnai brit to pursue and rule the chosen Cohen people with righteous justice based upon the ืžื™ืขื˜ ืคืจื˜ of Uriah the Hittite mussar rebuke by which the prophet Natan cursed David with eternal Civil War blood shed; David failed in this specific particular case to sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach, no different than king Shaul who failed to obey the prophetic mussar commanded by Shemuel which order Shaul to slaughter Amalek. This ื›ืœืœ – ืคืจื˜ middah “brick” of rabbi Yishmael serves to defines the k’vanna dedication of the mitzva of Moshiach, like as does the ืจื‘ื•ื™ ืžื™ืขื˜ excludes little girls from the mitzva of kiddushin.

            The wisdom of the Torah affixed through Av tohor time-oriented commandments. As positive & negative Torah commandments serves as common law precedents having the purpose to discern k’vanna required for av time oriented commandment … thereby elevated to av tohor commandments rather than remaining as secondary precedent commandments which do not require k’vanna. This “Torah wisdom” equally applies to Oral Torah halachic mitzvot within and across the Talmud which too do not require k’vanna. The Aggadic portions of the Talmud make a ื“ืจื•ืฉ\ืคืฉื˜ to T’NaCH Primary sources which permits all generations of Talmudic scholarship to learn the k’vanna of prophetic mussar and “weave” this prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of observing halachic mitzvot ritual observances as codified in the later rabbinic codes. The halachot codified in the Shulkan Aruch statute law assimilated perversion of the Rambam base error – do not require k’vanna. The commentaries made upon the Rambam’s Yad fail to affix his halachic “translations” to a specific halachah within the B’HaG or Rif or Rosh common law codes which open with a specific Mishna. Hence all these ื™ืจื™ื“ื•ืช ื”ื“ื•ืจื•ืช-domino effect, down stream generations of error – treif.

        2. Nicholas K F Matte Avatar

          Beam me up Ro.! Hahahaha, just teasin’, oooh ayoyyyyy, lol

          1. justrojie Avatar

            lol

  2. Violet Lentz Avatar

    I cannot even fathom this.

    1. justrojie Avatar

      it’s a wild world we live in

  3. ibarynt Avatar

    What is this alternate reality now? I think I want to go back to the stone age or ice age.

    1. justrojie Avatar

      there’s no turning back now

  4. Nicholas K F Matte Avatar

    Informatics? A masters? Woww!! I use ai for searches and quick manga drawings, that’s about it so far. You wrote a GREAT post!! I always love your blog Ro.!! It’s true it’s good to keep a creator’s eye on the subject, ai that is.

    1. justrojie Avatar

      thanks, nico! i have a few degrees but this is one of them.

      1. Nicholas K F Matte Avatar

        Ya, you’re an AMAZING cookie! Trully,๐Ÿ˜‰

  5. Jake Pickard Avatar

    Crustafarianism is it a religion based on thin pizza crust?

    1. justrojie Avatar

      lol i was thinking more like crustaceans? but i could also be wrong

      1. Jake Pickard Avatar

        Crab rangoon thin crust pizza

        1. justrojie Avatar

          It almost sounds good lol

  6. ianmdudley Avatar

    I can’t wait for this bubble to burst.

    1. justrojie Avatar

      me too

  7. Sambuca (โœฟโ— โ€ฟโ— ) Avatar

    Wow. AI is starting to assimilate. Idk whether to be happy or sad? Or freaking scared, better put?

    1. justrojie Avatar

      i think a little of all the above?

  8. cheryldale600 Avatar

    Very interesting

    1. justrojie Avatar

      danke!

  9. ibarynt Avatar

    We need a revolution ๐Ÿ˜†

    1. justrojie Avatar

      lol the billionaires keep funneling money into this

      1. ibarynt Avatar

        Nowhere to spend it.

        1. justrojie Avatar

          They could spend it on the population but they choose not to. Greedy assholes

          1. ibarynt Avatar

            The population doesn’t exist for them.

  10. Jesse Pallante Avatar

    Yes AI is here to stay. We better get used to it or we will be fired from any job we get.

    1. justrojie Avatar

      yup!! i know pple ordering food all the time use it and that’s how they target their ads too lol

  11. Jesse Pallante Avatar

    Wow!! ๐Ÿ˜‚

    1. justrojie Avatar

      lol yup!!

  12. Hazel Avatar

    I’m afraid they will be sentient, too. That masters of informatics sounds cool, Rojie. I’m not opposed to AI, but I’m concerned about my data in the future. It’s collecting all.

    1. justrojie Avatar

      it probably has everything already tbh

      1. Hazel Avatar

        I think so

Leave a Reply